CommandCodeAI / CommandCodeAI/command-code

GOAT Plan: DeepSeek V4 Flash Cache Read billed ~53% higher than published rate (off-peak usage)

Abierto
#722 3 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Lenguaje dominante
Sin datos de lenguaje
Estrellas
4k
Forks
350
Métricas de merge de PR
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Descripción

Summary
Description

I've identified a billing discrepancy on the GOAT plan when using DeepSeek V4 Flash. The actual cost for Cache Read tokens is significantly higher than the published rate in the official pricing table, while Input and Output costs match the table exactly.

Expected Behavior

Based on the official GOAT pricing table for DeepSeek V4 Flash:

  • Input: $0.22/M
  • Output: $0.66/M
  • Cache Read: $0.007/M

With my usage (all during off-peak hours):

  • Input: 2.5M × $0.22 = $0.55

  • Output: 0.7874M × $0.66 = $0.5197

  • Cache Read: 83.1M × $0.007 = $0.5817

  • Total expected: $1.65

Actual Behavior

Dashboard shows:

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash: $1.96

  • web_search: $0.01

  • Total actual: $1.97

That's a $0.31 difference

Image Image
Steps to reproduce the issue
  1. Use DeepSeek V4 Flash on the GOAT plan during off-peak hours.
  2. Generate significant Cache Read usage (83.1M tokens over 2 days).
  3. Compare the actual billed amount against the official pricing table.
Supporting Information
Command Code Version

1.29.0

Environment
  • Plan: GOAT
  • Model: DeepSeek V4 Flash
  • Usage Period: August 17–18, 2026
  • Usage Window: All off-peak hours (no peak-time surcharges should apply)
  • ZDR (Zero Data Retention): Not enabled
Operating System

macOS

Terminal/IDE

WezTerm

Shell

zsh

Session file (optional)

No response

Fix prompt (optional)

No response

Additional context

I contacted support and was told that the GOAT plan uses credits and each model consumes them at a different rate. However, this doesn't explain why only Cache Read deviates from the table while Input and Output match perfectly.

I've also discussed this with other users and the hourly pricing theory was suggested (peak/off-peak rates), but since all my usage was during off-peak hours, that doesn't account for the discrepancy.

Note on Trace IDs:

I cannot access the individual trace IDs for those days because the Command Code Studio UI only displays the last 100 requests. I've asked support if there's a way to retrieve the full history, but I don't have the granular per-request data to pinpoint exactly which requests caused the overage. If there's an API endpoint or log export I can use to get the full trace history, please let me know.

Guía de contribución

No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Línea de trabajo

Comienza con la tabla de precios de GOAT y el desglose de uso del dashboard para DeepSeek V4 Flash; después, investiga si el historial completo de trazas está disponible mediante una API o una exportación de logs. Compara la facturación de Cache Read durante el periodo de baja demanda indicado con la tarifa publicada; se considera terminado cuando la discrepancia se corrige o se explica claramente su base de facturación.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Área
ai, payments
Tipo de issue
Error
Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Estado de actividad
Activo
Claridad
Necesita aclaración
Aptitud para principiantes
35/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.