CommandCodeAI / CommandCodeAI/command-code
GOAT Plan: DeepSeek V4 Flash Cache Read billed ~53% higher than published rate (off-peak usage)
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Sin datos de lenguaje
- Estrellas
- 4k
- Forks
- 350
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
Summary
Description
I've identified a billing discrepancy on the GOAT plan when using DeepSeek V4 Flash. The actual cost for Cache Read tokens is significantly higher than the published rate in the official pricing table, while Input and Output costs match the table exactly.
Expected Behavior
Based on the official GOAT pricing table for DeepSeek V4 Flash:
- Input: $0.22/M
- Output: $0.66/M
- Cache Read: $0.007/M
With my usage (all during off-peak hours):
-
Input: 2.5M × $0.22 = $0.55
-
Output: 0.7874M × $0.66 = $0.5197
-
Cache Read: 83.1M × $0.007 = $0.5817
-
Total expected: $1.65
Actual Behavior
Dashboard shows:
-
DeepSeek V4 Flash: $1.96
-
web_search: $0.01
-
Total actual: $1.97
That's a $0.31 difference
Steps to reproduce the issue
- Use DeepSeek V4 Flash on the GOAT plan during off-peak hours.
- Generate significant Cache Read usage (83.1M tokens over 2 days).
- Compare the actual billed amount against the official pricing table.
Supporting Information
- Official pricing table: https://commandcode.ai/docs/plans/goat
- Usage breakdown (2 days):
- Cache Read: 83.1M
- Input (uncached): 2.5M
- Output: 0.7874M
- Total tokens: 86.4M
Command Code Version
1.29.0
Environment
- Plan: GOAT
- Model: DeepSeek V4 Flash
- Usage Period: August 17–18, 2026
- Usage Window: All off-peak hours (no peak-time surcharges should apply)
- ZDR (Zero Data Retention): Not enabled
Operating System
macOS
Terminal/IDE
WezTerm
Shell
zsh
Session file (optional)
No response
Fix prompt (optional)
No response
Additional context
I contacted support and was told that the GOAT plan uses credits and each model consumes them at a different rate. However, this doesn't explain why only Cache Read deviates from the table while Input and Output match perfectly.
I've also discussed this with other users and the hourly pricing theory was suggested (peak/off-peak rates), but since all my usage was during off-peak hours, that doesn't account for the discrepancy.
Note on Trace IDs:
I cannot access the individual trace IDs for those days because the Command Code Studio UI only displays the last 100 requests. I've asked support if there's a way to retrieve the full history, but I don't have the granular per-request data to pinpoint exactly which requests caused the overage. If there's an API endpoint or log export I can use to get the full trace history, please let me know.
Guía de contribución
No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con la tabla de precios de GOAT y el desglose de uso del dashboard para DeepSeek V4 Flash; después, investiga si el historial completo de trazas está disponible mediante una API o una exportación de logs. Compara la facturación de Cache Read durante el periodo de baja demanda indicado con la tarifa publicada; se considera terminado cuando la discrepancia se corrige o se explica claramente su base de facturación.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Área
- ai, payments
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100