CommandCodeAI / CommandCodeAI/command-code
GOAT Plan: DeepSeek V4 Flash Cache Read billed ~53% higher than published rate (off-peak usage)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 4k
- Forks
- 350
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Summary
Description
I've identified a billing discrepancy on the GOAT plan when using DeepSeek V4 Flash. The actual cost for Cache Read tokens is significantly higher than the published rate in the official pricing table, while Input and Output costs match the table exactly.
Expected Behavior
Based on the official GOAT pricing table for DeepSeek V4 Flash:
- Input: $0.22/M
- Output: $0.66/M
- Cache Read: $0.007/M
With my usage (all during off-peak hours):
-
Input: 2.5M × $0.22 = $0.55
-
Output: 0.7874M × $0.66 = $0.5197
-
Cache Read: 83.1M × $0.007 = $0.5817
-
Total expected: $1.65
Actual Behavior
Dashboard shows:
-
DeepSeek V4 Flash: $1.96
-
web_search: $0.01
-
Total actual: $1.97
That's a $0.31 difference
Steps to reproduce the issue
- Use DeepSeek V4 Flash on the GOAT plan during off-peak hours.
- Generate significant Cache Read usage (83.1M tokens over 2 days).
- Compare the actual billed amount against the official pricing table.
Supporting Information
- Official pricing table: https://commandcode.ai/docs/plans/goat
- Usage breakdown (2 days):
- Cache Read: 83.1M
- Input (uncached): 2.5M
- Output: 0.7874M
- Total tokens: 86.4M
Command Code Version
1.29.0
Environment
- Plan: GOAT
- Model: DeepSeek V4 Flash
- Usage Period: August 17–18, 2026
- Usage Window: All off-peak hours (no peak-time surcharges should apply)
- ZDR (Zero Data Retention): Not enabled
Operating System
macOS
Terminal/IDE
WezTerm
Shell
zsh
Session file (optional)
No response
Fix prompt (optional)
No response
Additional context
I contacted support and was told that the GOAT plan uses credits and each model consumes them at a different rate. However, this doesn't explain why only Cache Read deviates from the table while Input and Output match perfectly.
I've also discussed this with other users and the hourly pricing theory was suggested (peak/off-peak rates), but since all my usage was during off-peak hours, that doesn't account for the discrepancy.
Note on Trace IDs:
I cannot access the individual trace IDs for those days because the Command Code Studio UI only displays the last 100 requests. I've asked support if there's a way to retrieve the full history, but I don't have the granular per-request data to pinpoint exactly which requests caused the overage. If there's an API endpoint or log export I can use to get the full trace history, please let me know.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the GOAT pricing table and the dashboard usage breakdown for DeepSeek V4 Flash, then investigate whether full trace history is available through an API or log export. Compare Cache Read billing during the reported off-peak period with the published rate; done means the discrepancy is corrected or its billing basis is clearly explained.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- ai, payments
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100