Question: Feasibility of using more modern small language models
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 25/100
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- ai, machine-learning
调研方向
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing the repository's compilation and runtime entry points, then determine whether model selection, Cactus runtime support, server-side compilation, or RAG integration is in scope and what concrete outcome would define completion.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Hi I saw the reddit blog post on claudish and thought this is a very interesting thing. I was thinking if using a newer model like LFM2.5-230M or LFM2.5-350M might help to drastically improve the model's capabilities? I understand that changing models would require recompilation of the .paw file. I also saw some things about Cactus' runtime being made for edge and browser use, not sure if its is a promising alternative to what is used now. Also I would like to know more about the compilation process on the server as I dont think the source is published? It would help with experimentation greatly. Im also thinking about the possibility to use this as part of a RAG? What do you think? Thank you, just wanted to share some thoughts I had on this.
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 332
- 派生
- 31
- 平均合并
- 2 天 3 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 1
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
programasweights/programasweights-python 的其他 Issue
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
programasweights/programasweights-python#5 · 1 条评论 ·
查看 programasweights/programasweights-python 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 86/100
-
🐛 Bug 🔔 Pending processing
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
jumpserver/jumpserver#17584 ·