Question: Feasibility of using more modern small language models

未关闭
#4 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python

调研方向

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing the repository's compilation and runtime entry points, then determine whether model selection, Cactus runtime support, server-side compilation, or RAG integration is in scope and what concrete outcome would define completion.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Hi I saw the reddit blog post on claudish and thought this is a very interesting thing. I was thinking if using a newer model like LFM2.5-230M or LFM2.5-350M might help to drastically improve the model's capabilities? I understand that changing models would require recompilation of the .paw file. I also saw some things about Cactus' runtime being made for edge and browser use, not sure if its is a promising alternative to what is used now. Also I would like to know more about the compilation process on the server as I dont think the source is published? It would help with experimentation greatly. Im also thinking about the possibility to use this as part of a RAG? What do you think? Thank you, just wanted to share some thoughts I had on this.

主要语言
Python
星标
332
派生
31
平均合并
2 天 3 小时
30 天内合并 PR
1

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

programasweights/programasweights-python 的其他 Issue

查看 programasweights/programasweights-python 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。