Spectre Loadouts - Bundling spectres to ease work with combinations

Bắt đầu từ luồng "Manage Spectres..." và kiểm tra cách cửa sổ "Spectres in Build:" hiện đang nhận và lưu trữ các spectres. Xác định cách tạo, chọn, xem và chuyển loadouts giữa các cửa sổ, bao gồm cả chế độ xem hover được đề xuất. Công việc được hoàn thành khi người dùng có thể lưu nhiều tổ hợp spectres và chuyển một tổ hợp đã chọn vào một build để tính toán thông thường.

Check for duplicates

• I've checked for duplicate open and closed issues by using the search function of the issue tracker

What platform are you running Path of Building on?

Windows

Is your feature request related to a problem?

Spectre management within POB has seen improvements over the years, but it can still become tedious when dealing primarily with builds that utilize multiple types of spectres. For example, throughout the playthrough of a minion-based character, spectre pairings may change many times depending on character progression and wealth evaluation. Imported guides will then sometimes lump 5-6+ spectres into the library, expecting the player to differentiate between them. Also, comparing multiple combinations of 3-4 types can be quite cumbersome.

Describe the solution you'd like

When clicking on the "Manage Spectres..." button, a third, small window serving as a Spectre Loadout Hub of sorts could allow for combinations to be created and passed to the "Spectres in Build:" window much quicker. For example, say I wanted to compare two combinations of three spectres. The first could have Perfect Forest Warrior, Perfect Guardian Turtle, and Perfect Warlord, and it could be assigned to "Spectre Loadout 1." The second could have Pale Seraphim, Perfect Warlord, and Perfect Pain Artist, assigned to "Spectre Loadout 2." Moving either loadout to the "Spectres in Build:" window would list the three relevant spectres and calculate normally. For clarity, perhaps the user could be allowed to see the contents of a loadout with a hover feature or something similar.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response