reactjs / reactjs/react.dev

react-dom/server: clarify when `renderToPipeableStream` is appropriate

未关闭
#4,510 0 条评论 2 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

主要语言
JavaScript
星标
11.8k
派生
7.9k
平均合并
1 天 11 小时
30 天内合并 PR
11

描述

At https://reactjs.org/docs/react-dom-server.html#rendertopipeablestream we see this note:

This is a Node.js specific API and modern server environments should use renderToReadableStream instead.

I initially read this as saying "use renderToReadableStream in any environment where web streams are available." This includes modern versions of Node: https://nodejs.org/api/webstreams.html.

But going to the main React 18 release notes page https://reactjs.org/blog/2022/03/29/react-v18.html#react-dom-server, we see that there is a different distinction being made.

renderToPipeableStream: for streaming in Node environments.
renderToReadableStream: for modern edge runtime environments, such as Deno and Cloudflare workers.

(Aside: is Deno really an "edge runtime environment"? 🤔 )

Combined with @sebmarkbage's outlining of the downsides of web streams here https://github.com/reactwg/react-18/discussions/91, it seems clear that renderToPipeableStream should always be preferred in Node environments. It'd be nice if the docs clearly spelled this out.

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

从链接的 renderToPipeableStream 文档开始,并将其措辞与 React 18 发布说明以及链接的 web streams 讨论进行比较。明确 Node 环境与 edge runtime 之间的区别,并确认修订后的注释不再暗示现代 Node 应使用 renderToReadableStream。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
javascript, react
领域
documentation
Issue 类型
文档
难度
2/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
活跃度
停滞
描述清晰度
描述清楚
新手友好度
58/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。