How important is the `@_dispatchable` decorator in networkx?

Can this decorator be removed?

One obvious advantage for having it is to mirror runtime. It has some disadvantages though:

1. I can't for the life of me find a way to use it on overloaded functions. Indeed looking at the stubs, overloaded functions are stripped of this decorator
2. VS Code with Pylance does not show the documentation of the function on hover only when the decorator is used

I find the overload case very important that it outweighs the benefits of matching runtime. I also think the editor hover issue compelling on its own but one could argue that this should be discussed with the Pylance team instead.

I wonder if we could just get rid of the decorator altogether. Am I missing other reasons for having the decorator?

まず、typeshed における @_dispatchable デコレーターの使用箇所を追跡し、stubs 内のオーバーロードされた関数と比較します。runtime-mirroring の根拠と、報告されている Pylance の hover 動作を調査します。デコレーターを残すべきかどうかについて決定し、その決定を文書化または実装できれば完了です。