How important is the `@_dispatchable` decorator in networkx?

Can this decorator be removed?

One obvious advantage for having it is to mirror runtime. It has some disadvantages though:

1. I can't for the life of me find a way to use it on overloaded functions. Indeed looking at the stubs, overloaded functions are stripped of this decorator
2. VS Code with Pylance does not show the documentation of the function on hover only when the decorator is used

I find the overload case very important that it outweighs the benefits of matching runtime. I also think the editor hover issue compelling on its own but one could argue that this should be discussed with the Pylance team instead.

I wonder if we could just get rid of the decorator altogether. Am I missing other reasons for having the decorator?

首先，追踪 typeshed 中 @_dispatchable 装饰器的使用情况，并将其与 stubs 中的重载函数进行比较。调查 runtime-mirroring 的依据以及报告的 Pylance hover 行为。完成的标准是确定是否应保留该装饰器，并记录或实现这一决定。