Consistently mark types with `| MaybeNone` whenever it is applicable
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 5.1k
- 派生
- 2.1k
- 平均合并
- 1 天 19 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 82
描述
I noticed that there's a special type alias MaybeNone that represents this specific intent:
We didn't dare to change the type to
X | Noneso instead we changed it toAny
You can find an example in a relatively recent addition of this.
And while this approach makes me very sad, it is good that such cases are marked with MaybeNone, for the purpose of looking at them specially. Maybe some type checker will arise that will have specific handling for it and do something smarter instead.
With that in mind, it would be good to ensure that all such cases are consistently marked.
I noticed at least one case that is not marked like this. It has | Any directly written instead of | MaybeNone. This is in re.match.group*:
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从 stdlib/re.pyi 开始,尤其检查第 93–117 行附近的 re.match.group* 定义,并将其与 stdlib/_typeshed/init.pyi 中的 MaybeNone 别名进行比较。检查 stubs 中使用 Any 表示这一意图的类似情况;完成标准是适用的情况都一致改用 MaybeNone,并且没有发现未标记的例外。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- tooling
- Issue 类型
- 重构
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 42/100