python / python/importlib_metadata
entry_points doesn't handle empty .dist-info files well
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 142
- Forks
- 97
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Aucune PR mergée en 30 j
Description
This is related to https://github.com/python/importlib_metadata/issues/489 but with a different way to reach it.
The background is that our build process will delete files when packages are upgraded but will leave directories behind, because it doesn't track who created the directory and whether it should remain or not.
This means that over time you can end up with a site-packages that has a number of directories in, such as setuptools (with the code), setuptools-82.0.1.dist-info (with the 82.0.1 metadata) and also setuptools-82.0.0.dist-info which is empty.
If the on-disk order is returning the empty 82.0.0 before 82.0.1 then importlib_metadata.entry_points() will return a subset of what is expected.
For example, with a simple test case:
for x in metadata.entry_points():
print(x)
A fresh venv that has setuptools/build/pip installed finds 48 entry points:
EntryPoint(name='alias', value='setuptools.command.alias:alias', group='distutils.commands')
EntryPoint(name='bdist_egg', value='setuptools.command.bdist_egg:bdist_egg', group='distutils.commands')
EntryPoint(name='bdist_rpm', value='setuptools.command.bdist_rpm:bdist_rpm', group='distutils.commands')
EntryPoint(name='bdist_wheel', value='setuptools.command.bdist_wheel:bdist_wheel', group='distutils.commands')
EntryPoint(name='build', value='setuptools.command.build:build', group='distutils.commands')
...
EntryPoint(name='pip', value='pip._internal.cli.main:main', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='pip3', value='pip._internal.cli.main:main', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='pyproject-build', value='build.__main__:entrypoint', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='build', value='build.__main__:entrypoint', group='pipx.run')
But by creating setuptools-n.dist-info directories with different values of n until ls -U shows that it appears before the actual metadata has different behaviour and only finds 4 entry points:
EntryPoint(name='pip', value='pip._internal.cli.main:main', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='pip3', value='pip._internal.cli.main:main', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='pyproject-build', value='build.__main__:entrypoint', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='build', value='build.__main__:entrypoint', group='pipx.run')
Note that none of the setuptools EPs were listed.
My theory: the entry_points() method is listing all distributions and then doing a unique() on it, which will remove duplicate distributions based on the name with the simple logic that it takes the first one seen. With the broken setup I've described above this means it just returns the first, broken, dist and ignores the one with actual content.
I've verified locally that adding another _prefer_valid() call to Distribution.discover() resolves this by sorting valid dists first:
context = context or DistributionFinder.Context(**kwargs)
return cls._prefer_valid(itertools.chain.from_iterable(
resolver(context) for resolver in cls._discover_resolvers()
))
This feels like a bit of a heavy hammer though and possibly better logic in entry_points() would be preferable?
Guide de contribution
Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Reproduisez le problème en plaçant un répertoire setuptools-*.dist-info vide avant des métadonnées renseignées, puis comparez les résultats de entry_points(). Examinez Distribution.discover() et le chemin de entry_points(), y compris le comportement existant de _prefer_valid(). C’est terminé lorsque les métadonnées vides ne masquent plus les distributions renseignées et que les entry points attendus sont renvoyés.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- python
- Domaine
- tooling
- Type d'issue
- Bug
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Activité
- Calme
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 48/100