python / python/importlib_metadata
entry_points doesn't handle empty .dist-info files well
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 142
- Forks
- 97
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
This is related to https://github.com/python/importlib_metadata/issues/489 but with a different way to reach it.
The background is that our build process will delete files when packages are upgraded but will leave directories behind, because it doesn't track who created the directory and whether it should remain or not.
This means that over time you can end up with a site-packages that has a number of directories in, such as setuptools (with the code), setuptools-82.0.1.dist-info (with the 82.0.1 metadata) and also setuptools-82.0.0.dist-info which is empty.
If the on-disk order is returning the empty 82.0.0 before 82.0.1 then importlib_metadata.entry_points() will return a subset of what is expected.
For example, with a simple test case:
for x in metadata.entry_points():
print(x)
A fresh venv that has setuptools/build/pip installed finds 48 entry points:
EntryPoint(name='alias', value='setuptools.command.alias:alias', group='distutils.commands')
EntryPoint(name='bdist_egg', value='setuptools.command.bdist_egg:bdist_egg', group='distutils.commands')
EntryPoint(name='bdist_rpm', value='setuptools.command.bdist_rpm:bdist_rpm', group='distutils.commands')
EntryPoint(name='bdist_wheel', value='setuptools.command.bdist_wheel:bdist_wheel', group='distutils.commands')
EntryPoint(name='build', value='setuptools.command.build:build', group='distutils.commands')
...
EntryPoint(name='pip', value='pip._internal.cli.main:main', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='pip3', value='pip._internal.cli.main:main', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='pyproject-build', value='build.__main__:entrypoint', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='build', value='build.__main__:entrypoint', group='pipx.run')
But by creating setuptools-n.dist-info directories with different values of n until ls -U shows that it appears before the actual metadata has different behaviour and only finds 4 entry points:
EntryPoint(name='pip', value='pip._internal.cli.main:main', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='pip3', value='pip._internal.cli.main:main', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='pyproject-build', value='build.__main__:entrypoint', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='build', value='build.__main__:entrypoint', group='pipx.run')
Note that none of the setuptools EPs were listed.
My theory: the entry_points() method is listing all distributions and then doing a unique() on it, which will remove duplicate distributions based on the name with the simple logic that it takes the first one seen. With the broken setup I've described above this means it just returns the first, broken, dist and ignores the one with actual content.
I've verified locally that adding another _prefer_valid() call to Distribution.discover() resolves this by sorting valid dists first:
context = context or DistributionFinder.Context(**kwargs)
return cls._prefer_valid(itertools.chain.from_iterable(
resolver(context) for resolver in cls._discover_resolvers()
))
This feels like a bit of a heavy hammer though and possibly better logic in entry_points() would be preferable?
Guía de contribución
No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Reproduce el problema colocando un directorio setuptools-*.dist-info vacío delante de los metadatos completos y, a continuación, compara los resultados de entry_points(). Inspecciona Distribution.discover() y la ruta de entry_points(), incluido el comportamiento existente de _prefer_valid(). Se considera completado cuando los metadatos vacíos ya no ocultan las distribuciones con metadatos completos y se devuelven los entry points esperados.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- python
- Área
- tooling
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 48/100