python / python/importlib_metadata
entry_points doesn't handle empty .dist-info files well
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 142
- Forks
- 97
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
This is related to https://github.com/python/importlib_metadata/issues/489 but with a different way to reach it.
The background is that our build process will delete files when packages are upgraded but will leave directories behind, because it doesn't track who created the directory and whether it should remain or not.
This means that over time you can end up with a site-packages that has a number of directories in, such as setuptools (with the code), setuptools-82.0.1.dist-info (with the 82.0.1 metadata) and also setuptools-82.0.0.dist-info which is empty.
If the on-disk order is returning the empty 82.0.0 before 82.0.1 then importlib_metadata.entry_points() will return a subset of what is expected.
For example, with a simple test case:
for x in metadata.entry_points():
print(x)
A fresh venv that has setuptools/build/pip installed finds 48 entry points:
EntryPoint(name='alias', value='setuptools.command.alias:alias', group='distutils.commands')
EntryPoint(name='bdist_egg', value='setuptools.command.bdist_egg:bdist_egg', group='distutils.commands')
EntryPoint(name='bdist_rpm', value='setuptools.command.bdist_rpm:bdist_rpm', group='distutils.commands')
EntryPoint(name='bdist_wheel', value='setuptools.command.bdist_wheel:bdist_wheel', group='distutils.commands')
EntryPoint(name='build', value='setuptools.command.build:build', group='distutils.commands')
...
EntryPoint(name='pip', value='pip._internal.cli.main:main', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='pip3', value='pip._internal.cli.main:main', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='pyproject-build', value='build.__main__:entrypoint', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='build', value='build.__main__:entrypoint', group='pipx.run')
But by creating setuptools-n.dist-info directories with different values of n until ls -U shows that it appears before the actual metadata has different behaviour and only finds 4 entry points:
EntryPoint(name='pip', value='pip._internal.cli.main:main', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='pip3', value='pip._internal.cli.main:main', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='pyproject-build', value='build.__main__:entrypoint', group='console_scripts')
EntryPoint(name='build', value='build.__main__:entrypoint', group='pipx.run')
Note that none of the setuptools EPs were listed.
My theory: the entry_points() method is listing all distributions and then doing a unique() on it, which will remove duplicate distributions based on the name with the simple logic that it takes the first one seen. With the broken setup I've described above this means it just returns the first, broken, dist and ignores the one with actual content.
I've verified locally that adding another _prefer_valid() call to Distribution.discover() resolves this by sorting valid dists first:
context = context or DistributionFinder.Context(**kwargs)
return cls._prefer_valid(itertools.chain.from_iterable(
resolver(context) for resolver in cls._discover_resolvers()
))
This feels like a bit of a heavy hammer though and possibly better logic in entry_points() would be preferable?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Reproduce the issue by placing an empty setuptools-*.dist-info directory ahead of populated metadata, then compare the results of entry_points(). Inspect Distribution.discover() and the entry_points() path, including the existing _prefer_valid() behavior. Done means empty metadata no longer masks populated distributions and the expected entry points are returned.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100