hasattr() performance is bad on a slot that has no value

Bug report

Bug description:

Compare these two timeit invocations:

$ python3.14 -m timeit -s 'class Test: pass' -s 't = Test()' 'hasattr(t,"x")'
10000000 loops, best of 5: 33.5 nsec per loop
$ python3.14 -m timeit -s 'class Test: __slots__ = ("x",)' -s 't = Test()' 'hasattr(t,"x")'
1000000 loops, best of 5: 241 nsec per loop

Observe that in the case where Test.x is a slot, hasattr takes 241 ns to return False while it only takes 33.5 ns when there is no Test.x slot.

Peter Bierma advised me to file an issue when I asked about this in Discourse.

CPython versions tested on:

3.14, 3.13, 3.12

Operating systems tested on:

Linux

Comienza reproduciendo los dos comandos de timeit de Python 3.14 del issue y compara el caso del atributo ausente con el caso del slot sin valor. Rastrea la búsqueda del slot y la ruta de hasattr responsables de la diferencia. Se considera completado cuando el caso del slot sin valor mejora de forma medible sin cambiar el resultado False de hasattr ni el comportamiento existente.