macOS: abortive close (SO_LINGER {1,0}) of a flow-controlled loopback socket occasionally loses the RST, hanging asyncio peers

Summary

On macOS, when a flow-controlled (zero receive window) loopback TCP connection is abortively closed — setsockopt(SO_LINGER, {1, 0}) then close() — the reset (RST) is occasionally never delivered to the peer. The peer's socket stays ESTABLISHED forever: its registered reader never fires, getpeername() still succeeds, SO_ERROR == 0, and recv(..., MSG_PEEK) returns EWOULDBLOCK. The connection is left half-open.

The closing side is textbook-correct at close() time (still connected, SO_LINGER set to {1,0}, unsent bytes in the send buffer), and its fd is released cleanly (lsof confirms no lingering fd). So per POSIX/BSD semantics close() must emit a RST — but the peer never sees it, nor a FIN.

This surfaces as a permanent, silent hang of otherwise-correct asyncio programs on macOS. It is ultimately a macOS kernel lost-RST (it reproduces with plain selectors, no asyncio), but asyncio's normal teardown pattern makes it markedly more frequent — see below.

Reproducer

Full runnable reproducers + red CI on macOS: https://github.com/graingert/asyncio-macos-loopback-rst-hang

Three variants, all stdlib-only:

• repro.py — asyncio (loop.add_reader/add_writer + a call_soon-deferred abortive close)
• repro_selectors.py — plain selectors, immediate close
• repro_selectors_deferred.py — plain selectors, close deferred by one poll cycle

Each iteration: establish a loopback pair; the server never reads so the client's writes drive the window to zero and fill its send buffer; register the client fd, fill until send() blocks; unregister and abortively close the client; register the server and wait for the disconnect. If the disconnect never arrives within a timeout, the RST was lost.

Results (single ~10-minute CI run per cell; undelivered / total)

Rates are low (~1–13 per million) and noisy, so an occasional 0 does not mean "cannot reproduce."

Analysis

1. It is not an asyncio logic bug — it reproduces with a plain selectors (KqueueSelector) loop and no asyncio (macOS 14, immediate close). The underlying lost RST is macOS kernel behavior.
2. The deferred close amplifies it ~3–4×. "Deferred close" = a select()/kqueue poll cycle runs between unregistering the fd and abortively closing it:

   unregister(fd)  ->  select()  ->  setsockopt(SO_LINGER {1,0}); close(fd)
   

   The immediate-close variant (unregister(fd); close(fd) with no poll between) hits it much less often.
3. asyncio always inserts that poll cycle, because a transport's close()/abort is deferred to a later loop iteration via call_soon. That is why asyncio programs on macOS hit this most, and hang permanently when they do (loop.sock_recv / a registered reader that never fires).
4. Never observed on Linux (epoll) across many millions of iterations.

Environment

• macOS 14 and macOS 15 (GitHub-hosted macos-14 / macos-15 runners, Apple Silicon), CPython 3.13.
• Reproduces on the default SelectorEventLoop (KqueueSelector).
• Does not reproduce on Linux.

Not a duplicate of

• #77444 — "Asyncio server enters an invalid state after a request with SO_LINGER" (server-side accept/state; not a lost RST).
• #71573 — "Asyncio server hang when clients connect and immediately disconnect" (server-side hang; different mechanism).

Those are server-side; this is a client-side abortive close whose RST is lost, leaving the peer half-open.

リンクされた再現リポジトリの repro.py と repro_selectors.py から始め、asyncio の遅延クローズパスと macOS 上の単純な selectors のバリアントを比較してください。この issue では CPython に加えるべき変更は特定されていません。有用な結果とするには、CPython 側の緩和策が存在するかどうかを明らかにするか、macOS カーネルの制限を文書化し、再現コードで結果を検証する必要があります。