python / python/cpython

macOS: abortive close (SO_LINGER {1,0}) of a flow-controlled loopback socket occasionally loses the RST, hanging asyncio peers

Aberta
#153,117 3 comentários 1 reação 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

OS-mac topic-socket type-bug
Linguagem predominante
Python
Estrelas
77.2k
Forks
36k
Métricas de merge de PRs
Métricas de PR pendentes

Descrição

Summary

On macOS, when a flow-controlled (zero receive window) loopback TCP connection is abortively closedsetsockopt(SO_LINGER, {1, 0}) then close() — the reset (RST) is occasionally never delivered to the peer. The peer's socket stays ESTABLISHED forever: its registered reader never fires, getpeername() still succeeds, SO_ERROR == 0, and recv(..., MSG_PEEK) returns EWOULDBLOCK. The connection is left half-open.

The closing side is textbook-correct at close() time (still connected, SO_LINGER set to {1,0}, unsent bytes in the send buffer), and its fd is released cleanly (lsof confirms no lingering fd). So per POSIX/BSD semantics close() must emit a RST — but the peer never sees it, nor a FIN.

This surfaces as a permanent, silent hang of otherwise-correct asyncio programs on macOS. It is ultimately a macOS kernel lost-RST (it reproduces with plain selectors, no asyncio), but asyncio's normal teardown pattern makes it markedly more frequent — see below.

Reproducer

Full runnable reproducers + red CI on macOS: https://github.com/graingert/asyncio-macos-loopback-rst-hang

Three variants, all stdlib-only:

  • repro.py — asyncio (loop.add_reader/add_writer + a call_soon-deferred abortive close)
  • repro_selectors.py — plain selectors, immediate close
  • repro_selectors_deferred.py — plain selectors, close deferred by one poll cycle

Each iteration: establish a loopback pair; the server never reads so the client's writes drive the window to zero and fill its send buffer; register the client fd, fill until send() blocks; unregister and abortively close the client; register the server and wait for the disconnect. If the disconnect never arrives within a timeout, the RST was lost.

Results (single ~10-minute CI run per cell; undelivered / total)

variant macOS 14 macOS 15 Linux
asyncio (deferred close) 19 / 1.46M 4 / 0.93M 0 / 1.1M
selectors, immediate close 5 / 1.55M 0 / 1.16M 0 / 1.3M
selectors, deferred close 21 / 1.89M 1 / 1.27M 0 / 1.3M

Rates are low (~1–13 per million) and noisy, so an occasional 0 does not mean "cannot reproduce."

Analysis

  1. It is not an asyncio logic bug — it reproduces with a plain selectors (KqueueSelector) loop and no asyncio (macOS 14, immediate close). The underlying lost RST is macOS kernel behavior.
  2. The deferred close amplifies it ~3–4×. "Deferred close" = a select()/kqueue poll cycle runs between unregistering the fd and abortively closing it:
    unregister(fd)  ->  select()  ->  setsockopt(SO_LINGER {1,0}); close(fd)
    
    The immediate-close variant (unregister(fd); close(fd) with no poll between) hits it much less often.
  3. asyncio always inserts that poll cycle, because a transport's close()/abort is deferred to a later loop iteration via call_soon. That is why asyncio programs on macOS hit this most, and hang permanently when they do (loop.sock_recv / a registered reader that never fires).
  4. Never observed on Linux (epoll) across many millions of iterations.

Environment

  • macOS 14 and macOS 15 (GitHub-hosted macos-14 / macos-15 runners, Apple Silicon), CPython 3.13.
  • Reproduces on the default SelectorEventLoop (KqueueSelector).
  • Does not reproduce on Linux.

Not a duplicate of

  • #77444 — "Asyncio server enters an invalid state after a request with SO_LINGER" (server-side accept/state; not a lost RST).
  • #71573 — "Asyncio server hang when clients connect and immediately disconnect" (server-side hang; different mechanism).

Those are server-side; this is a client-side abortive close whose RST is lost, leaving the peer half-open.

Guia de contribuição

Abrir o guia de contribuição

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Direção de pesquisa

Comece com repro.py e repro_selectors.py no repositório do reproducer vinculado e, em seguida, compare o caminho de fechamento adiado de asyncio com as variantes de selectors simples no macOS. A issue não identifica nenhuma alteração a ser feita no CPython; um resultado útil precisaria estabelecer se existe uma mitigação do lado do CPython ou documentar a limitação do kernel do macOS, com o reproducer validando o resultado.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Avaliação

Stack de tecnologia
macos, python
Domínio
networking
Tipo de issue
Bug
Dificuldade
5/5
Tempo estimado
Mais de uma semana
Status de atividade
Pouca atividade
Clareza
Precisa de esclarecimento
Facilidade para iniciantes
28/100

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.