Inc GC in 3.14t can defer too much, resulting in high memory use
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 77.2k
- 分支
- 36k
- PR 合併指標
- PR 指標待擷取
描述
Bug report
Bug description:
In the process of testing the default build incremental GC, I noticed a problem with the 3.14t GC. Shortly before the 3.14.0 release, I added some additional logic to defer GC triggering if the process memory use has not increased by 10% since the last collection. Unfortunately that does not work well with how mimalloc handles memory. It does not promptly return memory to the OS or mark pages as unused (e.g. with madvise). So, the process size from the point of view of the OS does not decrease after the GC frees cyclic trash.
For programs that create even modest amounts of cyclic garbage, this is a major problem. It acts as if the GC threshold has been set to 40x the "threshold0" value. By default, that means full GC collection every 80,000 net new objects. This is not a continuous memory leak but it means the process uses uses way more memory than it should.
The simple fix would be to just remove that process size based defer. However, that would result in regressing on the GH-132917 issue, so I wouldn't recommend that. I have a fairly simple fix that "asks mimalloc" how much memory is being used, rather than asking the OS. Based on my testing, that works well.
CPython versions tested on:
3.14
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
- gh-148940
- gh-149371
- gh-149475
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
先檢視連結的 PR gh-148940、gh-149371 和 gh-149475,然後追蹤 Linux 上 3.14 增量 GC 以程序大小為依據的延遲機制。將其記憶體使用量檢查與 mimalloc 回報的使用量進行比較,並驗證循環垃圾能夠被回收,而不會出現報告中所描述的過度記憶體增長。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- python
- 領域
- performance
- Issue 類型
- 缺陷
- 難度
- 4/5
- 預估耗時
- 3-5 天
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 25/100