Improve Py_mod_multiple_interpreters and Py_mod_gil Usability
未關閉
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
3.15
interpreter-core
topic-C-API
topic-free-threading
topic-subinterpreters
type-feature
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 77.2k
- 分支
- 35.9k
- PR 合併指標
- PR 指標待擷取
描述
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
Here are some deficiencies:
- the slot name "Py_mod_multiple_interpreters" is a bit long
- the "Py_MOD_MULTIPLE_INTERPRETERS_*" slot value names are a bit long
- the slot name "Py_mod_gil" is overly coupled to the GIL (it's really about thread safety)
- the difference between
Py_MOD_MULTIPLE_INTERPRETERS_SUPPORTEDandPy_MOD_PER_INTERPRETER_GIL_SUPPORTEDis unclear Py_MOD_PER_INTERPRETER_GIL_SUPPORTEDapplies to the vast majority of extensions and should be the defaultPy_mod_gildoesn't have an option that explicitly covers the case where an external dependency is not thread-safe- currently
Py_MOD_MULTIPLE_INTERPRETERS_SUPPORTEDimplies an external dependency is not thread-safe and/or isolated to each interpreter; it should be the other way around (and be a synonym forPy_MOD_PER_INTERPRETER_GIL_SUPPORTED), which would introduce a need for aPy_MOD_PER_INTERPRETER_GIL_NOT_SUPPORTED
We could take a simple approach, working with the existing slots:
- (maybe) shorten the names
- add
Py_MOD_PER_INTERPRETER_GIL_NOT_SUPPORTED - add something like
Py_MOD_GIL_USED_FOR_EXTERNAL
I think we could do better, by replacing the existing slots with new ones that focus explicitly on what we care about:
- new module def slot:
Py_mod_isolationPy_MOD_NOT_ISOLATED- the module has process-global state and/or objects (e.g. static types)Py_MOD_ISOLATED(default) - the module's state/objects have been isolated to the module (i.e interpreter)
- new module def slot:
Py_mod_threadsafePy_MOD_NOT_THREADSAFE(default) - the module's own state/code is not thread-safePy_MOD_THREADSAFE- the module's state/code are thread-safe; external dependencies are covered byPy_mod_external_libs
- new module def slot:
Py_mod_external_libsPy_MOD_EXTERN_NOT_THREADSAFE- at least one external dependency is not thread-safe (may be used without the GIL held)Py_MOD_EXTERN_NOT_ISOLATED- at least one external dependency is not isolated to the module object (i.e. interpreter)Py_MOD_EXTERN_ISOLATED(default) - all external dependencies are isolated and using them is thread-safe
- for
Py_mod_isolationandPy_mod_threadsafe, external dependencies are covered byPy_mod_external_libs - deprecate
Py_mod_multiple_interpretersslot - deprecate
Py_mod_gilslot
Regarding the defaults, for Py_mod_isolation, multi-phase init implies isolation (per PEP 489). For Py_mod_external_libs, we assume that the vast majority of modules will not have problematic dependencies.
Equivalents to current usage:
| Py_mod_threadsafe | Py_mod_external_libs | Py_mod_gil | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Py_MOD_NOT_THREADSAFE | * | Py_MOD_GIL_USED | |
| Py_MOD_THREADSAFE | Py_MOD_EXTERNAL_NOT_THREADSAFE | Py_MOD_GIL_USED | |
| Py_MOD_THREADSAFE | Py_MOD_EXTERNAL_NOT_ISOLATED | Py_MOD_GIL_NOT_USED | |
| Py_MOD_THREADSAFE | Py_MOD_EXTERNAL_ISOLATED | Py_MOD_GIL_NOT_USED |
| Py_mod_isolation | Py_mod_external_libs | Py_mod_multiple_interpreters | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Py_MOD_NOT_ISOLATED | * | Py_MOD_MULTIPLE_INTERPRETERS_NOT_SUPPORTED | |
| Py_MOD_ISOLATED | Py_MOD_EXTERNAL_NOT_THREADSAFE | Py_MOD_MULTIPLE_INTERPRETERS_SUPPORTED | |
| Py_MOD_ISOLATED | Py_MOD_EXTERNAL_NOT_ISOLATED | Py_MOD_MULTIPLE_INTERPRETERS_SUPPORTED | |
| Py_MOD_ISOLATED | Py_MOD_EXTERNAL_ISOLATED | Py_MOD_PER_INTERPRETER_GIL_SUPPORTED |
CC @encukou
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
No response given
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
該 issue 未指定原始碼檔案或測試;首先找出現有的 Py_mod_multiple_interpreters 和 Py_mod_gil slot 定義,並檢視它們目前的行為。先與維護者確定提議的 slot 名稱、預設值和 deprecations;完成這項工作需要一個已達成共識的設計,以及相應的實作和測試。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- python
- 領域
- backend
- Issue 類型
- 功能
- 難度
- 5/5
- 預估耗時
- 一週以上
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 需要釐清
- 新手友好度
- 25/100