Disallow arbitrary types in co_consts
@encukou y travaille déjà.
Depuis le 9/8/2024.
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Métriques de PR en attente
Description
co_consts can contain values of any type, including mutable ones. For example:
def f():
print(())
code = f.__code__
code = code.replace(co_consts=(None, []))
exec(code)
This is dangerous especially in the free-threaded build, which
- de-duplicates constants and
- immortalizes constants and relies them to be immortal
The “feature” is untested, as seen from the above snippet failing an assertion in free-threaded build.
Mutable subclasses of immutable built-in types are especially “interesting” here.
A solution would be to only allow built-in immutable marshallable types (booleans, integers, floating-point numbers, complex numbers, strings, bytes, tuples, frozensets, code objects, None, Ellipsis, StopIteration), excluding sublasses. That's a backwards-incompatible change.
Note that CPython now already recursively analyzes co_consts; there's little cost to doing additional inspection.
My current plan is:
- Disallow “bad” values in free-threaded builds in 3.14, as this build is still experimental and this breaks vital invariants.
- Deprecate “bad” values in regular build, and initially plan to disallow them in 3.16. (Minimal PEP-387 deprecation period chosen because this “feature” is very likely to interfere with optimizations, and unlikely to get proper test coverage.)
Until then, please avoid assuming that code constants are “sane”. (cc @brandtbucher @markshannon @colesbury)
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Évaluation
Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.