Sharing instance of proxy object across processes results in pickle errors
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 36k
- 平均合并
- 1 天 9 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 558
描述
Hello
I'm trying to understand if a SyncManager proxy object instances are supposed to be shareable accoss processes, and if so, how
Bug report
See https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/101320#issuecomment-1404187868 below
What I'm doing is the following:
- create a new sync manager, and use it to populate a proxy dictionary from the initial process
- in another process, connect to the sync manage, and read in a load the data from the proxy dictionary
- we read corrupted data out of the connection to the manager
Is this a bug or something that should be possible to do in python ?
I assume that the objects in syncmanager can be accessed through several processes, is it true ?
If so, what is the proper way to do it ? (I think that just using the same reference of proxy object accross forked processes is not supposed to work)
Your environment
python 3.9
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从报告中描述的 SyncManager 代理共享场景开始,并阅读链接的 issue 评论中关于所观察到的 pickle 错误的内容。在 Python 3.9 上跨进程重现该序列,然后确定损坏的数据是预期行为还是缺陷,并记录已确认的结果。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- operating-systems
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 新手友好度
- 30/100