prometheus / prometheus/client_python
MultiProcessCollector._accumulate_metrics always drops timestamps
まだ誰も着手していません。
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 4.4k
- フォーク
- 876
- 平均マージ
- 8日 4時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 1
説明
Summary
MultiProcessCollector._accumulate_metrics drops timestamps for all exported metrics, regardless of whether the selected sample or multiproc_mode used or needs them. This causes metrics file compaction routines (to cleanup old DB files from long-running web worker processes, for example) to drop samples that they otherwise wouldn't.
Details
MultiProcessCollector.merge calls _read_metrics to read all metrics (including dupes) from the DB files, followed by _accumulate_metrics to dedupe these based on multiproc_mode.
https://github.com/prometheus/client_python/blob/master/prometheus_client/multiprocess.py#L35-L44
In the docstring, it explicitly calls out the use case this affects (compaction by writing back to the mmap files):
But if writing the merged data back to mmap files, use
accumulate=False to avoid compound accumulation.
_accumulate_metrics considers the timestamp when deciding which sample to keep:
https://github.com/prometheus/client_python/blob/master/prometheus_client/multiprocess.py#L97-L116
However, it does not include this timestamp in the recreated sample it returns:
https://github.com/prometheus/client_python/blob/master/prometheus_client/multiprocess.py#L153
Impact
We have an internal compaction tool that effectively just periodically calls the MultiProcessCollector.merge method periodically, wrapped with an flock, and given the prevalence of open issues such as #568 I suspect others may too. Without this, long-running gunicorn processes with worker rotation settings will accumulate large numbers of stale files that slow scrape times significantly. This compaction ignores live pids, only compacting DBs from dead ones.
This issue results in this compaction potentially dropping samples that would otherwise have been the newest timestamp, simply because they've been compacted from a dead pid. Consider the following:
t1. process 1 and 2 spawn and define gauge my_gauge with multiproc_mode="mostrecent"
t2. process 1 samples my_gauge with timestamp=time.time()
t3. process 2 samples my_gauge with timestamp=time.time()
t4. process 2 dies
t5. compaction calls MultiProcessCollector.merge as part of stale DB compaction.
t6. MultiProcessCollector._accumulate_metrics returns the process 2 sample without a timestamp, which is then written to the compacted DB
t7. both future compaction and regular metrics exposition (via a scrape or otherwise) now drop the process 2 sample despite it being newest
Proposed Solution
Since the collector already tracks the sample timestamp in a defaultdict(float) and collection considers 0.0 and None equivalent, I think it should be as simple as changing the exported sample to this (or the equivalent):
timestamped_samples = []
for (name, label), value in samples.items():
without_pid_key = (name, tuple(l for l in labels if l[0] != 'pid'))
timestamped_samples.append(
prometheus_client.samples.Sample(
name_, dict(labels), value, sample_timestamps[without_pid_key]
)
)
metric.samples = timestamped_samples
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
調査の方向性
prometheus_client/multiprocess.py から始め、MultiProcessCollector.merge を _read_metrics と _accumulate_metrics に沿って追跡します。各マルチプロセスモードで選択された sample のタイムスタンプがどのように追跡され、再作成された sample がどのように書き込まれるかを確認します。完了の条件は、後の選択と exposition に必要なタイムスタンプをコンパクションが保持し、タイムスタンプを使用しないモードを変更しないことです。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- python
- 領域
- observability-sre
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 難易度
- 3/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1〜2日
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- 明確に書かれている
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 45/100