prometheus / prometheus/client_python
MultiProcessCollector._accumulate_metrics always drops timestamps
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 4.4k
- Forks
- 876
- Merge medio
- 8 d 4 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 1
Descripción
Summary
MultiProcessCollector._accumulate_metrics drops timestamps for all exported metrics, regardless of whether the selected sample or multiproc_mode used or needs them. This causes metrics file compaction routines (to cleanup old DB files from long-running web worker processes, for example) to drop samples that they otherwise wouldn't.
Details
MultiProcessCollector.merge calls _read_metrics to read all metrics (including dupes) from the DB files, followed by _accumulate_metrics to dedupe these based on multiproc_mode.
https://github.com/prometheus/client_python/blob/master/prometheus_client/multiprocess.py#L35-L44
In the docstring, it explicitly calls out the use case this affects (compaction by writing back to the mmap files):
But if writing the merged data back to mmap files, use
accumulate=False to avoid compound accumulation.
_accumulate_metrics considers the timestamp when deciding which sample to keep:
https://github.com/prometheus/client_python/blob/master/prometheus_client/multiprocess.py#L97-L116
However, it does not include this timestamp in the recreated sample it returns:
https://github.com/prometheus/client_python/blob/master/prometheus_client/multiprocess.py#L153
Impact
We have an internal compaction tool that effectively just periodically calls the MultiProcessCollector.merge method periodically, wrapped with an flock, and given the prevalence of open issues such as #568 I suspect others may too. Without this, long-running gunicorn processes with worker rotation settings will accumulate large numbers of stale files that slow scrape times significantly. This compaction ignores live pids, only compacting DBs from dead ones.
This issue results in this compaction potentially dropping samples that would otherwise have been the newest timestamp, simply because they've been compacted from a dead pid. Consider the following:
t1. process 1 and 2 spawn and define gauge my_gauge with multiproc_mode="mostrecent"
t2. process 1 samples my_gauge with timestamp=time.time()
t3. process 2 samples my_gauge with timestamp=time.time()
t4. process 2 dies
t5. compaction calls MultiProcessCollector.merge as part of stale DB compaction.
t6. MultiProcessCollector._accumulate_metrics returns the process 2 sample without a timestamp, which is then written to the compacted DB
t7. both future compaction and regular metrics exposition (via a scrape or otherwise) now drop the process 2 sample despite it being newest
Proposed Solution
Since the collector already tracks the sample timestamp in a defaultdict(float) and collection considers 0.0 and None equivalent, I think it should be as simple as changing the exported sample to this (or the equivalent):
timestamped_samples = []
for (name, label), value in samples.items():
without_pid_key = (name, tuple(l for l in labels if l[0] != 'pid'))
timestamped_samples.append(
prometheus_client.samples.Sample(
name_, dict(labels), value, sample_timestamps[without_pid_key]
)
)
metric.samples = timestamped_samples
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza en prometheus_client/multiprocess.py, siguiendo MultiProcessCollector.merge a través de _read_metrics y _accumulate_metrics. Verifica cómo se realiza el seguimiento de la marca de tiempo del sample seleccionado para cada modo multiproceso y cómo se escribe el sample recreado. Se considera terminado cuando la compactación conserva la marca de tiempo necesaria para la selección y la exposición posteriores, sin cambiar los modos que no utilizan marcas de tiempo.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- python
- Área
- observability-sre
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100