modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
Make JSON-RPC ID type coercion configurable
まだ誰も着手していません。
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 24.3k
- フォーク
- 4k
- 平均マージ
- 1日 1時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 31
説明
Background
PR #1720 added automatic type coercion for JSON-RPC response IDs, allowing string IDs like "0" to match integer request IDs like 0. This makes the client more tolerant of servers that echo back IDs in a different but semantically equivalent format.
Spec Language
Per the JSON-RPC 2.0 and MCP specifications, response IDs should be exact matches:
JSON-RPC 2.0: Response ID "MUST be the same as the value of the id member in the Request Object"
MCP Spec:
- Result responses "MUST include the same ID as the request they correspond to"
- Error responses "MUST include the same ID as the request they correspond to"
The language "same as the value" / "same ID" implies exact matching including type. The spec does not describe IDs as opaque and does not mandate type conversion or normalization. Servers should echo back the exact ID they received.
Current Behavior
PR #1720 makes the client more lenient by accepting type-coerced IDs (e.g., "0" matching 0). This is a workaround for non-compliant servers.
Proposal
Make this ID type coercion behavior configurable:
- Strict mode: Require exact type matching (spec-compliant behavior)
- Lenient mode: Allow type coercion between numeric strings and integers (current behavior after #1720)
This could be exposed as a session or client configuration option, defaulting to lenient for backwards compatibility.
Ideally strict mode is default, with an error message being clear as to why something fails. If we receive a response with an ID that's a string, even though the original request ID was an int we could first check if there are any IDs which would match after type coercion and then include that in the error message. "Request ID with same value of different type found, but ignored due to strict ID matching configuration".
Reasoning
By spec language, request ID 1 and request ID "1" are different IDs, but with this type coercion they are treated as the same. Given that many clients/servers are non-compliant with this anyway and do their own type conversions we should allow server/client users of the SDK to configure the behaviour for themselves.
Related
- #1720 - Fix JSON-RPC error response ID matching
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
調査の方向性
まず PR #1720 と、現在の JSON-RPC レスポンス ID マッチング実装を確認します。この issue では具体的なファイルやテストは指定されていません。セッションまたはクライアントの設定をどこに置くべきかを判断し、そのうえで、厳密なマッチングと寛容な数値変換を選択できることを、レスポンス ID が一致しない場合の明確な処理と後方互換性の維持とともに確認します。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- python
- 領域
- api, backend-api-design
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 難易度
- 4/5
- 見積もり時間
- 3〜5日
- 活発さ
- 静か
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 45/100