modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

Make JSON-RPC ID type coercion configurable

Aberta
#1,795 2 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

bug P3 v2
Linguagem predominante
Python
Estrelas
24.3k
Forks
4k
Merge médio
1d 1h
PRs com merge (30d)
31

Descrição

Background

PR #1720 added automatic type coercion for JSON-RPC response IDs, allowing string IDs like "0" to match integer request IDs like 0. This makes the client more tolerant of servers that echo back IDs in a different but semantically equivalent format.

Spec Language

Per the JSON-RPC 2.0 and MCP specifications, response IDs should be exact matches:

JSON-RPC 2.0: Response ID "MUST be the same as the value of the id member in the Request Object"

MCP Spec:

  • Result responses "MUST include the same ID as the request they correspond to"
  • Error responses "MUST include the same ID as the request they correspond to"

The language "same as the value" / "same ID" implies exact matching including type. The spec does not describe IDs as opaque and does not mandate type conversion or normalization. Servers should echo back the exact ID they received.

Current Behavior

PR #1720 makes the client more lenient by accepting type-coerced IDs (e.g., "0" matching 0). This is a workaround for non-compliant servers.

Proposal

Make this ID type coercion behavior configurable:

  • Strict mode: Require exact type matching (spec-compliant behavior)
  • Lenient mode: Allow type coercion between numeric strings and integers (current behavior after #1720)

This could be exposed as a session or client configuration option, defaulting to lenient for backwards compatibility.

Ideally strict mode is default, with an error message being clear as to why something fails. If we receive a response with an ID that's a string, even though the original request ID was an int we could first check if there are any IDs which would match after type coercion and then include that in the error message. "Request ID with same value of different type found, but ignored due to strict ID matching configuration".

Reasoning

By spec language, request ID 1 and request ID "1" are different IDs, but with this type coercion they are treated as the same. Given that many clients/servers are non-compliant with this anyway and do their own type conversions we should allow server/client users of the SDK to configure the behaviour for themselves.

Related

  • #1720 - Fix JSON-RPC error response ID matching

Guia de contribuição

Abrir o guia de contribuição

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Direção de pesquisa

Comece revisando o PR #1720 e a implementação atual de correspondência de IDs de resposta JSON-RPC; a issue não especifica arquivos ou testes. Determine onde deve ficar a configuração de sessão ou cliente e, em seguida, verifique se a correspondência estrita e a coerção numérica flexível podem ser selecionadas, com tratamento claro para IDs de resposta incompatíveis e compatibilidade retroativa preservada.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Avaliação

Stack de tecnologia
python
Domínio
api, backend-api-design
Tipo de issue
Funcionalidade
Dificuldade
4/5
Tempo estimado
3-5 dias
Status de atividade
Pouca atividade
Clareza
Razoavelmente clara
Facilidade para iniciantes
45/100

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.