Using pointer address as node/symbol id

Nodes and symbols currently store an atomic integer representing their ID, which is lazily assigned upon first use. I was playing with using the pointer addresses as their ID, reducing the size of those structures and avoiding atomic reads on access.

func GetNodeId(node *Node) NodeId {
  return NodeId(uint64(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(node))))
}

func GetSymbolId(symbol *Symbol) SymbolId {
  return SymbolId(uint64(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(symbol))))
}

A potential downside is that KeyBuilder will observe larger numbers, requiring additional bytes to represent various keys. It may also affect ordering as IDs will no longer be strictly increasing, but I believe this shouldn't matter given that ID assignment is already non-deterministic.

A quick attempt passes the hereby test and shows a slight reduction in overall memory usage, but I don't have good insight into actual performance benfits/downsides of this approach.

I am opening this as issue instead of PR to discuss, possibly to learn this has been considered and may have been rejected for some reason. I'd be happy to open a PR if desired.

まず GetNodeId と GetSymbolId の例を読み、次に KeyBuilder が ID をどのように表現しているかを確認します。報告されたベースラインを再現するために hereby test を実行してください。この issue では、メモリ、パフォーマンス、キーサイズ、順序付けへの影響について議論すること以外に、受け入れ基準は定義されていません。