microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Wrong inference for defaulted generic in nested call
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Go
- 星标
- 111k
- 派生
- 14.3k
- 平均合并
- 2 天 4 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 132
描述
🔎 Search Terms
nested generic call inline inference contextual typing function calls default type parameter
🕗 Version & Regression Information
- I see the same issue from version 4.1.5 to nightly in TypeScript Playground
⏯ Playground Link
💻 Code
declare function join<T extends string, U extends string, V extends string = ''>(start: T, end: U, sep?: V): `${T}${V}${U}`
declare function expect<T>(value: T): { toBe(expected: T): void }
expect(join('Hello', 'World')).toBe('HelloWorld') // bad
const withoutSeparator = join('Hello', 'World')
// ^? const withoutSeparator: "HelloWorld"
expect(withoutSeparator).toBe("HelloWorld") // good
expect(join('Hello', 'World', ' ')).toBe('Hello World') // good
🙁 Actual behavior
TypeScript does not infer the return types correctly of a nested function call when an optional generic param is omitted, even if a default is provided. When the function call is not nested, it is inferred correctly. It is also inferred correctly when all params are provided.
🙂 Expected behavior
I would expect that both of these approaches would compile:
expect(join('Hello', 'World')).toBe('HelloWorld') // bad
const withoutSeparator = join('Hello', 'World')
expect(withoutSeparator).toBe("HelloWorld") // good
Additional information about the issue
There are very similar issues, such as #54184, #56714, and #62680 but they didn't quite match up to what I'm seeing here, particularly since the reproductions are quite a bit more complex.
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先运行链接的 TypeScript Playground 复现,并将嵌套调用与独立调用和完整指定的调用进行比较。阅读相关 issue #54184、#56714 和 #62680,了解现有的推断上下文。当两个省略分隔符的示例都能以预期的字面量类型编译,同时提供分隔符的情况仍然正确时,即表示完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- typescript
- 领域
- compilers
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 冷清
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 45/100