Improve behavior of typescript.preferences.importModuleSpecifier: non-relative

⭐ Suggestion

Currently, with this setting"typescript.preferences.importModuleSpecifier": "non-relative" VScode goes to the tsconfig file and checks both baseUrl and paths and look for a match.

The situation that I experience is having a few paths in my path property and they sometimes overlap.
Example:

"baseUrl": ".",
    "paths": {
           "*": ["src/main/*"],
          "utilsFunctions/*": ["src/main/utils/utilsFunctions*"],
      },

With this configuration I can import a function from the utilsFunctions folder in one of these 2 options:

1. import { foo } from "src/main/utils/utilsFunctions/functions.ts
2. import { foo } from "utilsFunctions/functions.ts

Both of these import statements will work.

But If I add foo in my code without writing the import statement myself, vscode will auto-suggest me to use option no. 1, but In my case, I actually wanted option no.2 (in the above options).

Requested behavior:
When using foo (without it importing it first), VScode should suggest me both options.

My solution, in this case, was to reverse the order of paths like this:

    "paths": {
          "utilsFunctions/*": ["src/main/utils/utilsFunctions*"],
           "*": ["src/main/*"],
      },

🔍 Search Terms

importModuleSpecifier

✅ Viability Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

• [ ✅ ] This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
• [ ✅ ] This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
• [ ✅ ] This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
• [ ✅ ] This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
• [ ✅ ] This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

まず、typescript.preferences.importModuleSpecifier を non-relative に設定した、tsconfig baseUrl と paths が重複するケースを再現します。インポート候補がどのように選択されるかを追跡し、有効なモジュール指定子の両方をどのように提示すべきかを判断します。要求された代替候補が、既存のランタイム動作を変更せずに提案されれば完了です。