Parentheses in nullish coalescing chains impacts type narrowing

Bug Report

🔎 Search Terms

nullish coalescing chain parentheses type narrowing prettier

🕗 Version & Regression Information

This is the behavior in every version I tried, and I reviewed the FAQ for entries about nullish coalescing. Note that at the time of writing, 4.3.5 was the latest stable release.

⏯ Playground Link

Playground link with relevant code

💻 Code

type T =
  | { a: string; b: string }
  | { a: string; b?: undefined }
  | { a?: undefined; b: string };

const getResult1 = (value1: string | undefined, value2: T): string => {
  return value1 ?? value2.a ?? value2.b;
};

const getResult2 = (value1: string | undefined, value2: T): string => {
  return value1 ?? (value2.a ?? value2.b);
};

🙁 Actual behavior

• getResult1 throws a type error, as TypeScript incorrectly infers that value2.b has a type of string | undefined.
• getResult2 does not throw a type error, as TypeScript correctly infers that value2.b has a type of string.

🙂 Expected behavior

The existence and placement of parentheses in nullish coalescing chains should not impact type narrowing, as to my knowledge (and prettier, as it automatically removes the parentheses seen in getResult2), x ?? y ?? z and x ?? (y ?? z) actually behave the same at runtime.

Inizia dalla riproduzione collegata in TypeScript Playground e confronta le diagnosi per getResult1 e getResult2. Traccia il modo in cui le catene di nullish coalescing e le espressioni tra parentesi influenzano il restringimento dei tipi, quindi aggiungi un test di regressione che copra entrambe le forme equivalenti. Il lavoro è completato quando entrambe le forme inferiscono value2.b come string e producono lo stesso risultato accettato.