microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Introduce the opposite of the non-null assertion
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- Go
- Étoiles
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Merge moyen
- 1 j 19 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 117
Description
Search Terms
non-null assertion opposite
Suggestion
The opposite of the "non-null assertion", used to force the compiler to believe that something may be undefined.
The most obvious syntax would be a "?" postfix operator, similar to how the non-null assertion is a "!" postfix operator. This would be consistent with the use of "?" for optional function params and object properties (which adds "undefined" to the type).
Use Cases
Indexing into arrays and "dictionary" objects with indexes/keys that are expected to potentially not exist.
Arrays and dictionary objects (an object type with the string index defined) are typically defined as having items whose type does NOT include undefined, even though it is technically possible (and valid) to use a non-existent index/key and get an undefined value as a result. In most situations, this avoids unnecessary/tedious non-null assertions, because arrays are often iterated (indexes guaranteed to exist), and dictionary objects are often used only to lookup keys that are guaranteed to exist.
However, in situations where an "untrusted" index/key is used on an array/dictionary, there is no convenient way to alter the type of the expression to indicate that the programmer is aware that the result may be undefined:
Examples
declare const array: Date[];
declare const untrustedIndex: number;
// Type is Date, but it may actually be undefined at runtime.
const item = array[untrustedIndex];
// To get useful "correct" typing, I must explicitly cast, duplicating the type
// of the item and adding "| undefined"
const item2 = array[untrustedIndex] as Date | undefined;
// Using the new proposed "possibly undefined assertion"
// Type is Date | undefined
const item3 = array[untrustedIndex]?;
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- [?] This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript / JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. new expression-level syntax)
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Aucun fichier du dépôt, test ou point d’entrée n’est nommé. Commencez par examiner la syntaxe postfixée proposée ainsi que les exemples de tableaux et de dictionnaires, puis localisez les parties du compilateur qui gèrent les assertions postfixées et l’accès indexé. La tâche sera considérée comme terminée lorsqu’une conception approuvée et une implémentation validée par rapport au comportement de typage décrit seront disponibles.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- typescript
- Domaine
- compilers
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- À clarifier
- Accessibilité débutants
- 20/100