haskell/pvp

View on GitHub

Haskell Package Version Policy (PVP)

Stars: 40
Forks: 24
Open beginner issues: 0
Indexed issues: 21

Dominant language: CSS
License: No license data
Last GitHub push: Aug 14, 2024
Latest indexed: Sep 14, 2026
Contributing guide: Contributing guide
Code of conduct: No code of conduct
Beginner labels: No beginner labels indexed
PR merge metrics: No merged PRs in 30d

Open All

21 open issues indexed

Orphan instance packages Open

haskell/pvp#3 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Wording about A.B.C number Open

haskell/pvp#4 · 7 comments · 2 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Versioning policy for Internal modules Open

enhancement Specification

haskell/pvp#8 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Convention for (optional) annotation of non-inferable major version increments Open

enhancement Specification

haskell/pvp#10 · 3 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Give guidance about patch releases? Open

Specification

haskell/pvp#15 · 5 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Does not address Safe Haskell related breakage Open

haskell/pvp#22 · 4 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Is the PVP transitive? Open

haskell/pvp#23 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Is it PVP conform if a package leaks orphan instances or not depending on the versions of its transitive dependencies? Open

haskell/pvp#24 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
FAQ should mention x-uncurated Open

haskell/pvp#29 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
new version number suggestions seem wrong? Open

haskell/pvp#31 · 6 comments · 1 reaction · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Does removing a Cabal flag constitute a breaking change? Open

haskell/pvp#33 · 3 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Remove the "2.0.1.0 > 2.0.1" example, or clarify that this is bad Open

haskell/pvp#36 · 4 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Clarify rule two Open

haskell/pvp#40 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
condition 2 (Non-breaking changes) examples are too limited Open

haskell/pvp#41 · 11 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
(non-enforced) section on prerelease versions? Open

haskell/pvp#42 · 3 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Do you need help with pvp.haskell.org? Open

haskell/pvp#43 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Clarify bumping policy for bug fixes Open

haskell/pvp#49 · 4 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
What is the goal of the PVP? Open

haskell/pvp#55 · 21 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
remove misleading "suggest changes" link Open

haskell/pvp#62 · 7 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Statistics ideas for master's thesis Open

haskell/pvp#63 · 19 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026
Type constraint changes Open

haskell/pvp#65 · 17 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 14, 2026

haskell/pvp

Get new issues in your inbox