condition 2 (Non-breaking changes) examples are too limited

> 3. Other changes. Otherwise, e.g. if change consist only of corrected documentation, non-visible change to allow different dependency range etc. A.B.C MAY remain the same (other version components may change).

Surely if I do a small tweak that improves output formatting say, that would also come under this, right?

Only mentioning documentation and dependency range changes here seems too small a class of examples to me, no?

Start with the quoted “Other changes” wording in Condition 2 and review the surrounding Haskell Package Version Policy specification. Determine how output-formatting changes should be represented among the non-breaking examples, then confirm the revised examples clearly cover the intended class without changing the policy’s meaning.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.