Remove the "2.0.1.0 > 2.0.1" example, or clarify that this is bad

It is true that `2.0.1.0 > 2.0.1` in the lexicographic ordering, because mathematically, a missing number at the end counts as _minus infinity_. However, in versioning practice, a missing number at the end defaults to `0`.

If after `2.0.1` you release `2.0.1.0`, it is either by accident, ignorance or spite, in order to confuse others; imo.

There is already a more fundamental discussion at #4, I raised this issue to at least remove or better comment the `2.0.1.0 > 2.0.1` example which could give the idea that such versioning is good practice.