latest-prerelease lookup strands users on 1.0.81-9: releases share created_at, so GitHub ranks -10 below -2 and the first listed prerelease is chosen
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Shell
- 星标
- 11.2k
- 派生
- 1.9k
- 平均合并
- 14 小时 16 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 6
描述
latest-prerelease lookup strands users on 1.0.81-9
Summary
copilot update prerelease refuses to advance from 1.0.81-9 to 1.0.81-10, reporting the older build as the latest available release:
> copilot --no-auto-update update prerelease
Checking for updates...
Checking GitHub for the latest release...
No update needed, current version is 1.0.81-9, fetched latest release is v1.0.81-9
At the time of that run, v1.0.81-10 had been published for ~1.5 hours and was not a draft:
> gh api repos/github/copilot-cli/releases/tags/v1.0.81-10 \
--jq '"tag=\(.tag_name) draft=\(.draft) prerelease=\(.prerelease) published=\(.published_at) assets=\(.assets|length)"'
tag=v1.0.81-10 draft=false prerelease=true published=2026-08-25T21:15:43Z assets=20
Root cause
Every 1.0.81-N release shares an identical created_at, so GitHub's list endpoint cannot order them by creation time and falls back to a lexicographic tiebreak. "10" sorts below "2", so -10 lands in the middle of the list rather than at the top:
> gh api "repos/github/copilot-cli/releases?per_page=12" \
--jq '.[] | "\(.tag_name) created=\(.created_at) published=\(.published_at)"'
v1.0.81-9 created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z published=2026-08-24T17:42:32Z
v1.0.81-8 created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z published=2026-08-23T14:46:46Z
v1.0.81-7 created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z published=2026-08-21T18:39:24Z
v1.0.81-6 created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z published=2026-08-20T17:59:54Z
v1.0.81-5 created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z published=2026-08-19T23:16:31Z
v1.0.81-4 created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z published=2026-08-19T18:23:39Z
v1.0.81-3 created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z published=2026-08-19T08:46:57Z
v1.0.81-2 created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z published=2026-08-19T04:28:01Z
v1.0.81-10 created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z published=2026-08-25T21:15:43Z <-- newest, ranked 9th
v1.0.81-1 created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z published=2026-08-18T18:30:50Z
v1.0.81-0 created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z published=2026-08-14T23:47:01Z
v1.0.80 created=2026-08-10T16:19:17Z published=2026-08-14T02:28:39Z
The selection appears to take the first prerelease in that default ordering. In app.js, the update routine logs the message above from:
if (nR.lte(s.tag_name, Kh())) {
let u = `No update needed, current version is ${Kh()}, fetched latest release is ${s.tag_name}`;
...
}
where s originates from lx() → uht("latest-prerelease", ...) → native githubLookupRelease(...).
Worth emphasising: the comparison is not the bug. nR.lte is semver-aware and ranks 1.0.81-9 < 1.0.81-10 correctly (numeric prerelease identifiers compare numerically). The wrong value is the release that gets fetched. Since GitHub exposes no "latest prerelease" endpoint (/releases/latest returns v1.0.80, the newest stable), the native lookup must enumerate — and it trusts list order.
Impact
Any prerelease line that reaches -10 strands every user on -9 for the remainder of that line. This is not self-correcting: it persists until a new stable or minor version is published. It affects both explicit copilot update prerelease and the automatic startup update check, on all platforms.
Steps to reproduce
- Be on
1.0.81-9(or install it). - Run
copilot --no-auto-update update prerelease. - Observe
No update needed ... fetched latest release is v1.0.81-9, despitev1.0.81-10being published.
The --no-auto-update prefix matters for a clean repro: without it, the startup auto-update check inflates the reported running version, so a plain copilot update prerelease compares against an already-elevated value and no-ops for a second, unrelated reason.
Suggested fix
Don't rely on list ordering. After enumerating non-draft releases, select the maximum by semver (or by published_at) before comparing against the running version. A one-line jq equivalent that resolves correctly today:
[.[] | select(.draft == false)] | sort_by(.published_at) | reverse | .[0].tag_name
Separately, giving each release a distinct created_at at publish time would remove the ambiguity at the source, though the client-side sort is the durable fix.
Workaround
Download the release asset for the desired tag directly and replace the binary, bypassing the update check entirely.
Environment
- Windows 11,
win32-x64 - Copilot CLI
1.0.81-9(standalone exe), attempting to reach1.0.81-10
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从 app.js 中 lx() 经过 uht("latest-prerelease", ...) 到 native githubLookupRelease() 的更新路径开始。使用列出的 GitHub API 请求复现 release 顺序,然后检查非 draft release 是如何枚举的,以及选择了哪个 release。完成标准是能够可靠地选择最新的 prerelease tag,并且更新从 1.0.81-9 推进到 1.0.81-10。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- github, javascript
- 领域
- api, cli, release
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 新手友好度
- 68/100