github / github/copilot-cli

latest-prerelease lookup strands users on 1.0.81-9: releases share created_at, so GitHub ranks -10 below -2 and the first listed prerelease is chosen

未关闭
#4,605 1 条评论 3 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

area:installation
主要语言
Shell
星标
11.2k
派生
1.9k
平均合并
14 小时 16 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
6

描述

latest-prerelease lookup strands users on 1.0.81-9

Summary

copilot update prerelease refuses to advance from 1.0.81-9 to 1.0.81-10, reporting the older build as the latest available release:

> copilot --no-auto-update update prerelease
Checking for updates...
Checking GitHub for the latest release...
No update needed, current version is 1.0.81-9, fetched latest release is v1.0.81-9

At the time of that run, v1.0.81-10 had been published for ~1.5 hours and was not a draft:

> gh api repos/github/copilot-cli/releases/tags/v1.0.81-10 \
    --jq '"tag=\(.tag_name) draft=\(.draft) prerelease=\(.prerelease) published=\(.published_at) assets=\(.assets|length)"'
tag=v1.0.81-10 draft=false prerelease=true published=2026-08-25T21:15:43Z assets=20

Root cause

Every 1.0.81-N release shares an identical created_at, so GitHub's list endpoint cannot order them by creation time and falls back to a lexicographic tiebreak. "10" sorts below "2", so -10 lands in the middle of the list rather than at the top:

> gh api "repos/github/copilot-cli/releases?per_page=12" \
    --jq '.[] | "\(.tag_name)  created=\(.created_at)  published=\(.published_at)"'
v1.0.81-9   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-24T17:42:32Z
v1.0.81-8   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-23T14:46:46Z
v1.0.81-7   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-21T18:39:24Z
v1.0.81-6   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-20T17:59:54Z
v1.0.81-5   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-19T23:16:31Z
v1.0.81-4   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-19T18:23:39Z
v1.0.81-3   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-19T08:46:57Z
v1.0.81-2   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-19T04:28:01Z
v1.0.81-10  created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-25T21:15:43Z   <-- newest, ranked 9th
v1.0.81-1   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-18T18:30:50Z
v1.0.81-0   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-14T23:47:01Z
v1.0.80     created=2026-08-10T16:19:17Z  published=2026-08-14T02:28:39Z

The selection appears to take the first prerelease in that default ordering. In app.js, the update routine logs the message above from:

if (nR.lte(s.tag_name, Kh())) {
  let u = `No update needed, current version is ${Kh()}, fetched latest release is ${s.tag_name}`;
  ...
}

where s originates from lx()uht("latest-prerelease", ...) → native githubLookupRelease(...).

Worth emphasising: the comparison is not the bug. nR.lte is semver-aware and ranks 1.0.81-9 < 1.0.81-10 correctly (numeric prerelease identifiers compare numerically). The wrong value is the release that gets fetched. Since GitHub exposes no "latest prerelease" endpoint (/releases/latest returns v1.0.80, the newest stable), the native lookup must enumerate — and it trusts list order.

Impact

Any prerelease line that reaches -10 strands every user on -9 for the remainder of that line. This is not self-correcting: it persists until a new stable or minor version is published. It affects both explicit copilot update prerelease and the automatic startup update check, on all platforms.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Be on 1.0.81-9 (or install it).
  2. Run copilot --no-auto-update update prerelease.
  3. Observe No update needed ... fetched latest release is v1.0.81-9, despite v1.0.81-10 being published.

The --no-auto-update prefix matters for a clean repro: without it, the startup auto-update check inflates the reported running version, so a plain copilot update prerelease compares against an already-elevated value and no-ops for a second, unrelated reason.

Suggested fix

Don't rely on list ordering. After enumerating non-draft releases, select the maximum by semver (or by published_at) before comparing against the running version. A one-line jq equivalent that resolves correctly today:

[.[] | select(.draft == false)] | sort_by(.published_at) | reverse | .[0].tag_name

Separately, giving each release a distinct created_at at publish time would remove the ambiguity at the source, though the client-side sort is the durable fix.

Workaround

Download the release asset for the desired tag directly and replace the binary, bypassing the update check entirely.

Environment

  • Windows 11, win32-x64
  • Copilot CLI 1.0.81-9 (standalone exe), attempting to reach 1.0.81-10

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

从 app.js 中 lx() 经过 uht("latest-prerelease", ...) 到 native githubLookupRelease() 的更新路径开始。使用列出的 GitHub API 请求复现 release 顺序,然后检查非 draft release 是如何枚举的,以及选择了哪个 release。完成标准是能够可靠地选择最新的 prerelease tag,并且更新从 1.0.81-9 推进到 1.0.81-10。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
github, javascript
领域
api, cli, release
Issue 类型
缺陷
难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
活跃度
活跃
描述清晰度
描述清楚
新手友好度
68/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。