github / github/copilot-cli

latest-prerelease lookup strands users on 1.0.81-9: releases share created_at, so GitHub ranks -10 below -2 and the first listed prerelease is chosen

Aperta
#4,605 1 commento 3 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

area:installation
Lingua principale
Shell
Stelle
11.2k
Fork
1.9k
Merge medio
14h 16m
PR unite (30g)
6

Descrizione

latest-prerelease lookup strands users on 1.0.81-9

Summary

copilot update prerelease refuses to advance from 1.0.81-9 to 1.0.81-10, reporting the older build as the latest available release:

> copilot --no-auto-update update prerelease
Checking for updates...
Checking GitHub for the latest release...
No update needed, current version is 1.0.81-9, fetched latest release is v1.0.81-9

At the time of that run, v1.0.81-10 had been published for ~1.5 hours and was not a draft:

> gh api repos/github/copilot-cli/releases/tags/v1.0.81-10 \
    --jq '"tag=\(.tag_name) draft=\(.draft) prerelease=\(.prerelease) published=\(.published_at) assets=\(.assets|length)"'
tag=v1.0.81-10 draft=false prerelease=true published=2026-08-25T21:15:43Z assets=20

Root cause

Every 1.0.81-N release shares an identical created_at, so GitHub's list endpoint cannot order them by creation time and falls back to a lexicographic tiebreak. "10" sorts below "2", so -10 lands in the middle of the list rather than at the top:

> gh api "repos/github/copilot-cli/releases?per_page=12" \
    --jq '.[] | "\(.tag_name)  created=\(.created_at)  published=\(.published_at)"'
v1.0.81-9   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-24T17:42:32Z
v1.0.81-8   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-23T14:46:46Z
v1.0.81-7   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-21T18:39:24Z
v1.0.81-6   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-20T17:59:54Z
v1.0.81-5   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-19T23:16:31Z
v1.0.81-4   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-19T18:23:39Z
v1.0.81-3   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-19T08:46:57Z
v1.0.81-2   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-19T04:28:01Z
v1.0.81-10  created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-25T21:15:43Z   <-- newest, ranked 9th
v1.0.81-1   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-18T18:30:50Z
v1.0.81-0   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-14T23:47:01Z
v1.0.80     created=2026-08-10T16:19:17Z  published=2026-08-14T02:28:39Z

The selection appears to take the first prerelease in that default ordering. In app.js, the update routine logs the message above from:

if (nR.lte(s.tag_name, Kh())) {
  let u = `No update needed, current version is ${Kh()}, fetched latest release is ${s.tag_name}`;
  ...
}

where s originates from lx()uht("latest-prerelease", ...) → native githubLookupRelease(...).

Worth emphasising: the comparison is not the bug. nR.lte is semver-aware and ranks 1.0.81-9 < 1.0.81-10 correctly (numeric prerelease identifiers compare numerically). The wrong value is the release that gets fetched. Since GitHub exposes no "latest prerelease" endpoint (/releases/latest returns v1.0.80, the newest stable), the native lookup must enumerate — and it trusts list order.

Impact

Any prerelease line that reaches -10 strands every user on -9 for the remainder of that line. This is not self-correcting: it persists until a new stable or minor version is published. It affects both explicit copilot update prerelease and the automatic startup update check, on all platforms.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Be on 1.0.81-9 (or install it).
  2. Run copilot --no-auto-update update prerelease.
  3. Observe No update needed ... fetched latest release is v1.0.81-9, despite v1.0.81-10 being published.

The --no-auto-update prefix matters for a clean repro: without it, the startup auto-update check inflates the reported running version, so a plain copilot update prerelease compares against an already-elevated value and no-ops for a second, unrelated reason.

Suggested fix

Don't rely on list ordering. After enumerating non-draft releases, select the maximum by semver (or by published_at) before comparing against the running version. A one-line jq equivalent that resolves correctly today:

[.[] | select(.draft == false)] | sort_by(.published_at) | reverse | .[0].tag_name

Separately, giving each release a distinct created_at at publish time would remove the ambiguity at the source, though the client-side sort is the durable fix.

Workaround

Download the release asset for the desired tag directly and replace the binary, bypassing the update check entirely.

Environment

  • Windows 11, win32-x64
  • Copilot CLI 1.0.81-9 (standalone exe), attempting to reach 1.0.81-10

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia in app.js nel percorso di aggiornamento da lx() passando per uht("latest-prerelease", ...) fino a native githubLookupRelease(). Riproduci l’ordine delle release con la richiesta all’API GitHub indicata, quindi esamina come vengono enumerate le release non in stato draft e quale release viene selezionata. Il lavoro è completato quando il tag di prerelease più recente viene selezionato in modo affidabile e l’aggiornamento passa da 1.0.81-9 a 1.0.81-10.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
github, javascript
Ambito
api, cli, release
Tipo di issue
Bug
Difficoltà
3/5
Tempo stimato
1-2 giorni
Stato di attività
Attiva
Chiarezza
Specificata chiaramente
Idoneità per principianti
68/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.