github / github/copilot-cli

latest-prerelease lookup strands users on 1.0.81-9: releases share created_at, so GitHub ranks -10 below -2 and the first listed prerelease is chosen

Offen
#4,605 1 Kommentar 3 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

area:installation
Vorherrschende Sprache
Shell
Sterne
11.2k
Forks
1.9k
Ø Merge
14 Std. 16 Min.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
6

Beschreibung

latest-prerelease lookup strands users on 1.0.81-9

Summary

copilot update prerelease refuses to advance from 1.0.81-9 to 1.0.81-10, reporting the older build as the latest available release:

> copilot --no-auto-update update prerelease
Checking for updates...
Checking GitHub for the latest release...
No update needed, current version is 1.0.81-9, fetched latest release is v1.0.81-9

At the time of that run, v1.0.81-10 had been published for ~1.5 hours and was not a draft:

> gh api repos/github/copilot-cli/releases/tags/v1.0.81-10 \
    --jq '"tag=\(.tag_name) draft=\(.draft) prerelease=\(.prerelease) published=\(.published_at) assets=\(.assets|length)"'
tag=v1.0.81-10 draft=false prerelease=true published=2026-08-25T21:15:43Z assets=20

Root cause

Every 1.0.81-N release shares an identical created_at, so GitHub's list endpoint cannot order them by creation time and falls back to a lexicographic tiebreak. "10" sorts below "2", so -10 lands in the middle of the list rather than at the top:

> gh api "repos/github/copilot-cli/releases?per_page=12" \
    --jq '.[] | "\(.tag_name)  created=\(.created_at)  published=\(.published_at)"'
v1.0.81-9   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-24T17:42:32Z
v1.0.81-8   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-23T14:46:46Z
v1.0.81-7   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-21T18:39:24Z
v1.0.81-6   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-20T17:59:54Z
v1.0.81-5   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-19T23:16:31Z
v1.0.81-4   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-19T18:23:39Z
v1.0.81-3   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-19T08:46:57Z
v1.0.81-2   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-19T04:28:01Z
v1.0.81-10  created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-25T21:15:43Z   <-- newest, ranked 9th
v1.0.81-1   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-18T18:30:50Z
v1.0.81-0   created=2026-08-14T20:20:00Z  published=2026-08-14T23:47:01Z
v1.0.80     created=2026-08-10T16:19:17Z  published=2026-08-14T02:28:39Z

The selection appears to take the first prerelease in that default ordering. In app.js, the update routine logs the message above from:

if (nR.lte(s.tag_name, Kh())) {
  let u = `No update needed, current version is ${Kh()}, fetched latest release is ${s.tag_name}`;
  ...
}

where s originates from lx()uht("latest-prerelease", ...) → native githubLookupRelease(...).

Worth emphasising: the comparison is not the bug. nR.lte is semver-aware and ranks 1.0.81-9 < 1.0.81-10 correctly (numeric prerelease identifiers compare numerically). The wrong value is the release that gets fetched. Since GitHub exposes no "latest prerelease" endpoint (/releases/latest returns v1.0.80, the newest stable), the native lookup must enumerate — and it trusts list order.

Impact

Any prerelease line that reaches -10 strands every user on -9 for the remainder of that line. This is not self-correcting: it persists until a new stable or minor version is published. It affects both explicit copilot update prerelease and the automatic startup update check, on all platforms.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Be on 1.0.81-9 (or install it).
  2. Run copilot --no-auto-update update prerelease.
  3. Observe No update needed ... fetched latest release is v1.0.81-9, despite v1.0.81-10 being published.

The --no-auto-update prefix matters for a clean repro: without it, the startup auto-update check inflates the reported running version, so a plain copilot update prerelease compares against an already-elevated value and no-ops for a second, unrelated reason.

Suggested fix

Don't rely on list ordering. After enumerating non-draft releases, select the maximum by semver (or by published_at) before comparing against the running version. A one-line jq equivalent that resolves correctly today:

[.[] | select(.draft == false)] | sort_by(.published_at) | reverse | .[0].tag_name

Separately, giving each release a distinct created_at at publish time would remove the ambiguity at the source, though the client-side sort is the durable fix.

Workaround

Download the release asset for the desired tag directly and replace the binary, bypassing the update check entirely.

Environment

  • Windows 11, win32-x64
  • Copilot CLI 1.0.81-9 (standalone exe), attempting to reach 1.0.81-10

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
  4. Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Rechercherichtung

Beginnen Sie in app.js beim Update-Pfad von lx() über uht("latest-prerelease", ...) zu native githubLookupRelease(). Stellen Sie die Release-Reihenfolge mit der aufgeführten GitHub-API-Anfrage nach und prüfen Sie anschließend, wie nicht als Entwurf markierte Releases aufgelistet werden und welches Release ausgewählt wird. Als erledigt gilt die Aufgabe, wenn das neueste Prerelease-Tag zuverlässig ausgewählt wird und das Update von 1.0.81-9 auf 1.0.81-10 fortschreitet.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Bewertung

Tech-Stack
github, javascript
Bereich
api, cli, release
Issue-Typ
Bug
Schwierigkeit
3/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
1-2 Tage
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Klarheit
Klar beschrieben
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
68/100

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.