The auto model choice recently matched me with Claude Haiku.
- 主要言語
- 言語のデータがありません
- スター
- 2.1k
- フォーク
- 153
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
説明
The auto model choice recently matched me with Claude Haiku. Even with complex tasks, the reasoning en reponses of Haiku do not match the quality I expect. It also uses a lot of icons in it's response, making them hard to read. I allways need to switch to a medium teer model just to get another summary which is readable, because I'm to annoyed with the kinder garden icons.
---
| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| App version | 1.1.3 |
| OS | Windows 10.0.26100 |
| Theme | GitHub |
| Path | /chat |
| Tenure | Week 10 |
コントリビューションガイド
調査の方向性
Start at the /chat entry point and reproduce the automatic model choice in app version 1.1.3 on Windows 10, comparing the Haiku response with the medium-tier model. The issue does not name a source file or test, and completion criteria for model selection and response formatting need to be defined before implementation.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 領域
- ai, desktop
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 静か
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 25/100