The auto model choice recently matched me with Claude Haiku.

The auto model choice recently matched me with Claude Haiku. Even with complex tasks, the reasoning en reponses of Haiku do not match the quality I expect. It also uses a lot of icons in it's response, making them hard to read. I allways need to switch to a medium teer model just to get another summary which is readable, because I'm to annoyed with the kinder garden icons.

---
| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| App version | 1.1.3 |
| OS | Windows 10.0.26100 |
| Theme | GitHub |
| Path | /chat |
| Tenure | Week 10 |

Start at the /chat entry point and reproduce the automatic model choice in app version 1.1.3 on Windows 10, comparing the Haiku response with the medium-tier model. The issue does not name a source file or test, and completion criteria for model selection and response formatting need to be defined before implementation.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.