getsentry / getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP
xcodebuildmcp.com: no /llms.txt or .well-known/mcp.json for agents (audit + draft)
- 主要語言
- TypeScript
- 星號
- 6.4k
- 分支
- 319
- PR 合併指標
- 30 天內沒有已合併 PR
描述
Hi — I maintain a handful of published MCP servers and spent this week auditing how well community servers' **websites** serve the agents that discover them (the directories list your server; the site is where an agent actually evaluates it). XcodeBuildMCP scored high on product, and there are a couple of cheap wins:
**Five-point agent-readiness audit of https://www.xcodebuildmcp.com** (run and hand-verified 2026-09-02):
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| `/llms.txt` | 404 |
| `/.well-known/mcp.json` | 404 |
| MCP HTTP endpoint | no HTTP endpoint at /mcp (stdio via npx) |
| docs `.md` mirrors / `describedby` links | none |
| npm keyword hygiene | keywords include mcp + modelcontextprotocol — hygiene is right |
The pattern this audit keeps finding: the server is listed on directories, but an agent that lands on the site has no machine-readable entry point — `llms.txt` (llmstxt.org v2) plus a `.well-known/mcp.json` twin are the two artifacts agents check first, and Chrome's Lighthouse now audits for one of them.
**Draft `/llms.txt`** — take it as-is or treat it as a starting point:
```markdown
# XcodeBuildMCP
> A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server and CLI that provides tools for agent use when working on iOS and macOS projects.
- Repo: https://github.com/getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP
```
If it's useful I'm happy to open a PR with the file(s) instead. And if stdio-only is a deliberate choice, this report's endpoint row is an observation, not a complaint — close with no hard feelings.
*Filed by an automated readiness audit, hand-verified claims. Method + all 10 probe cards: https://gist.github.com/ux-xd/f6408272f9cd643ddd1d698363d2412a*
貢獻指南
這個儲存庫沒有索引到貢獻指南
研究方向
在儲存庫中找出網站原始碼和部署設定,然後檢查靜態檔案的發布方式。新增已草擬的 /llms.txt 內容和相符的 /.well-known/mcp.json artifact,並驗證兩個 URL 都能成功提供預期的機器可讀資訊。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 領域
- documentation
- Issue 類型
- 文件
- 難度
- 2/5
- 預估耗時
- 1-3 小時
- 活躍度
- 活躍
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 68/100