getsentry / getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP
xcodebuildmcp.com: no /llms.txt or .well-known/mcp.json for agents (audit + draft)
- Linguagem predominante
- TypeScript
- Estrelas
- 6.4k
- Forks
- 319
- Métricas de merge de PRs
- Nenhum PR com merge em 30d
Descrição
Hi — I maintain a handful of published MCP servers and spent this week auditing how well community servers' **websites** serve the agents that discover them (the directories list your server; the site is where an agent actually evaluates it). XcodeBuildMCP scored high on product, and there are a couple of cheap wins:
**Five-point agent-readiness audit of https://www.xcodebuildmcp.com** (run and hand-verified 2026-09-02):
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| `/llms.txt` | 404 |
| `/.well-known/mcp.json` | 404 |
| MCP HTTP endpoint | no HTTP endpoint at /mcp (stdio via npx) |
| docs `.md` mirrors / `describedby` links | none |
| npm keyword hygiene | keywords include mcp + modelcontextprotocol — hygiene is right |
The pattern this audit keeps finding: the server is listed on directories, but an agent that lands on the site has no machine-readable entry point — `llms.txt` (llmstxt.org v2) plus a `.well-known/mcp.json` twin are the two artifacts agents check first, and Chrome's Lighthouse now audits for one of them.
**Draft `/llms.txt`** — take it as-is or treat it as a starting point:
```markdown
# XcodeBuildMCP
> A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server and CLI that provides tools for agent use when working on iOS and macOS projects.
- Repo: https://github.com/getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP
```
If it's useful I'm happy to open a PR with the file(s) instead. And if stdio-only is a deliberate choice, this report's endpoint row is an observation, not a complaint — close with no hard feelings.
*Filed by an automated readiness audit, hand-verified claims. Method + all 10 probe cards: https://gist.github.com/ux-xd/f6408272f9cd643ddd1d698363d2412a*
Guia de contribuição
Nenhum guia de contribuição indexado para este repositório
Direção de pesquisa
Localize o código-fonte do site e a configuração de deployment no repositório e, em seguida, analise como os arquivos estáticos são publicados. Adicione o conteúdo elaborado de /llms.txt e um artefato correspondente /.well-known/mcp.json, e verifique se ambas as URLs são servidas com sucesso com as informações legíveis por máquina pretendidas.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Avaliação
- Domínio
- documentation
- Tipo de issue
- Documentação
- Dificuldade
- 2/5
- Tempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 68/100