fluent / fluent/fluent-logger-node

Error events take too much time to emit when fluentd is not available

オープン
#167 コメント 2 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る
主要言語
JavaScript
スター
258
フォーク
82
PR マージ指標
30日以内にマージされた PR はありません

説明

Hey,
We are using your library to send logs from our lambda functions to fluentd via Bunyan Logger.

```
// Instance style fluent-logger creation
const sender = require('fluent-logger').createFluentSender('tag-prefix', {
enableReconnect: false,
host: 'localhost',
port: 24224,
reconnectInterval: 3000,
requireAckResponse: true,
timeout: 3.0
});

// Listener for detecting error events
sender.on('error', (error) => {
console.log('Error found on stream here. ' + error);
// Printing the logs on stdout using the buffer.
});

// bunyan logger instance for sending logs to fluentd.
logger = bunyan.createLogger({
name: 'FluentdLogger',
streams: [{ stream: sender.toStream('fluentd') }]
});

logger.info('this log record is sent to fluent daemon');
```
1. Using the above mentioned approach, the logs are successfully being sent to fluentd from lambda.
2. However, when fluentd is not available, then the expected behavior is to catch the error event during the creation of bunyan instance and send the logs to stdout.

However, we have noticed that it takes a significant amount of time for the error event to be emitted when fluentd is not available, before which the lambda is completing its execution thus not reaching the error handler.

```
setTimeout(()=> sender.end(), 5000);
```
The above snippet seems to not work for me.

Therefore, is there any way to:
1. Avoid delaying the lambda execution in the case when fluentd is not available and error event needs to be caught?
2. If not, then what is the best way to perform a timeout so as to make the lambda quit after the error listener code has been executed?

It would be great if anyone could advise me on it.

コントリビューションガイド

このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません

評価

この issue はまだ評価されていません。

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。