fluent / fluent/fluent-logger-node

Error events take too much time to emit when fluentd is not available

未关闭
#167 2 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
主要语言
JavaScript
星标
258
派生
82
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

描述

Hey,
We are using your library to send logs from our lambda functions to fluentd via Bunyan Logger.

```
// Instance style fluent-logger creation
const sender = require('fluent-logger').createFluentSender('tag-prefix', {
enableReconnect: false,
host: 'localhost',
port: 24224,
reconnectInterval: 3000,
requireAckResponse: true,
timeout: 3.0
});

// Listener for detecting error events
sender.on('error', (error) => {
console.log('Error found on stream here. ' + error);
// Printing the logs on stdout using the buffer.
});

// bunyan logger instance for sending logs to fluentd.
logger = bunyan.createLogger({
name: 'FluentdLogger',
streams: [{ stream: sender.toStream('fluentd') }]
});

logger.info('this log record is sent to fluent daemon');
```
1. Using the above mentioned approach, the logs are successfully being sent to fluentd from lambda.
2. However, when fluentd is not available, then the expected behavior is to catch the error event during the creation of bunyan instance and send the logs to stdout.

However, we have noticed that it takes a significant amount of time for the error event to be emitted when fluentd is not available, before which the lambda is completing its execution thus not reaching the error handler.

```
setTimeout(()=> sender.end(), 5000);
```
The above snippet seems to not work for me.

Therefore, is there any way to:
1. Avoid delaying the lambda execution in the case when fluentd is not available and error event needs to be caught?
2. If not, then what is the best way to perform a timeout so as to make the lambda quit after the error listener code has been executed?

It would be great if anyone could advise me on it.

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。