dry-python / dry-python/returns

Consider adding validators package

Aperta
#258 16 commenti 4 reazioni 1 assegnatario Rivendicata da @sobolevn Vedi su GitHub
enhancement help wanted
Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
4.4k
Fork
155
Merge medio
2h 27m
PR unite (30g)
22

Descrizione

Currently a lot of python tools just throw exceptions at us or even uses: `.is_valid()` and `.errors` properties. It is not type-safe at all. Sometimes it is hard to explain to people how to really use type-driven design and make invalid states unreachable.

My idea is that we need to write thin wrappers around popular typed validation packages: like `pydantic`, `cerebrus`, `schema`, etc to return really typed things.

We also need to think about API to be expressive and recognisable enough.

Related: https://gist.github.com/maksbotan/14b4bebda2acab98cdd158f85a970855
CC @maksbotan

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Valutazione

Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.