dry-python / dry-python/returns

Consider adding validators package

Ouverte
#258 16 commentaires 4 réactions 1 personne assignée Réclamée par @sobolevn Voir sur GitHub
enhancement help wanted
Langage dominant
Python
Étoiles
4.4k
Forks
155
Merge moyen
2 h 27 min
PR mergées (30 j)
22

Description

Currently a lot of python tools just throw exceptions at us or even uses: `.is_valid()` and `.errors` properties. It is not type-safe at all. Sometimes it is hard to explain to people how to really use type-driven design and make invalid states unreachable.

My idea is that we need to write thin wrappers around popular typed validation packages: like `pydantic`, `cerebrus`, `schema`, etc to return really typed things.

We also need to think about API to be expressive and recognisable enough.

Related: https://gist.github.com/maksbotan/14b4bebda2acab98cdd158f85a970855
CC @maksbotan

Guide de contribution

Ouvrir le guide de contribution

Évaluation

Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.