dry-python / dry-python/returns

Consider adding validators package

Abierto
#258 16 comentarios 4 reacciones 1 asignado Reclamado por @sobolevn Ver en GitHub
enhancement help wanted
Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
4.4k
Forks
155
Merge medio
2 h 27 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
22

Descripción

Currently a lot of python tools just throw exceptions at us or even uses: `.is_valid()` and `.errors` properties. It is not type-safe at all. Sometimes it is hard to explain to people how to really use type-driven design and make invalid states unreachable.

My idea is that we need to write thin wrappers around popular typed validation packages: like `pydantic`, `cerebrus`, `schema`, etc to return really typed things.

We also need to think about API to be expressive and recognisable enough.

Related: https://gist.github.com/maksbotan/14b4bebda2acab98cdd158f85a970855
CC @maksbotan

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Evaluación

Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.