[temp.res.general] p5: dependent names in other than type-only context

Consider the first sentence in [temp.res#general-5]

A qualified-id whose terminal name is dependent and that is in a type-only context is considered to denote a type.

How about the otherwise case? if the terminal name is not in a type-only context, whether it may denote a type or it definitely does not denote a type? It's difficult to infer the meaning of the otherwise cases from the current sentence.

Is it more clear if we change it to that

A qualified-id whose terminal name is dependent is considered to denote a type if and only if its terminal name is in a type-only context.

In this sentence, the subtext means the qualified-id can never denote a type if the dependent terminal name is not in a type-only context. This subtext also conforms to the intent of the standard.

Lea [temp.res#general-5], especialmente su primera oración y la redacción circundante; compare el texto propuesto «if and only if» con la intención expresada para los nombres dependientes fuera de contextos exclusivos de tipos. Se considera terminado cuando se resuelva la cuestión de la redacción y se actualice ese texto del estándar si se acepta la aclaración propuesta.