art049 / art049/my-python-event-loop
Code Restructure
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 15
- Forks
- 1
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
Enjoyed reading your code. It was quite comprehensive for your EuroPython 2024 talk. However, there were a few ideas that might make it more concise. This is a worthwhile project that you should pick back up. These are a few, but not all, of my quick observations. Implementing these may allow plugins for SELinux and osquery. Since coreutils is your home, these modifications could enable PyO3 stub files for an overlay over coreutils.
1. Binary search of cron schedules isnt very scalable.
- I'd use a heap or BST for these times. That way you can have horizontally distributed cron reads
- If you were to use your FastAPI lambda endpoint as a front-end for a SIEM, which isnt a bad idea, you would want to load balance this
- Might even be worth decoupling the call_at fxn
2. Passable locks associated with your handle data structure: parking-lot based queues
- Sometimes theres multiple handlers: for instance, high end TDM systems
- If you were to pass the per-thread loop context to PyO3/Rust, you may need to consider handling CFFI concurrency interrupts
3. Due to 2, _run_once should be rewritten to preempt... OnceLock and RwLocks would be seen here
- If you have a high end TDM system, you could have different loop contexts lock expensive resources and/or operations
4. Some of your code is redundant... abstract yourself of simple getters/setters
- Create a metaclass to help your trivial methods
5. Make the selector a TypedDict (inline dictionary in 3.14) or a dataclass
- _add_reader() and _add_writer() have been made inflexible
- Cut the implementation specific dependency so that events can be plugins
- This permits contextual EVENT_WRITEs...
Guía de contribución
No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio
Línea de trabajo
El issue menciona los puntos de entrada del bucle de eventos call_at, _run_once, _add_reader(), _add_writer(), el selector y los datos de los handles. Empieza por mapear esos puntos de entrada y sus relaciones actuales; no se nombran archivos ni tests. El trabajo solicitado no está limitado a un solo cambio, y el issue no define un criterio claro de finalización.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- fastapi, python, rust
- Área
- backend, operating-systems
- Tipo de issue
- Refactorización
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 15/100