Does af.regions work on 3D image input?

From the documentation it appears as though the method is designed to work in 2D only:
`def regions(image, conn = CONNECTIVITY.FOUR, out_type = Dtype.f32):
"""
Find the connected components in the image.

Parameters
----------
image : af.Array
- A 2 D arrayfire array representing an image.

conn : optional: af.CONNECTIVITY. default: af.CONNECTIVITY.FOUR.
- Specifies the connectivity of the pixels.

out_type : optional: af.Dtype. default: af.Dtype.f32.
- Specifies the type for the output.

Returns
---------

output : af.Array
- An array where each pixel is labeled with its component number.

"""
output = Array()
safe_call(backend.get().af_regions(c_pointer(output.arr), image.arr,
conn.value, out_type.value))
return output`

Start at the af.regions entry point and compare its documented 2D input description with the underlying ArrayFire af_regions behavior for 3D arrays. Verify the behavior with a minimal 3D input, then update the documentation to state the supported dimensionality and expected connectivity semantics.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.