Report invalid `module` field in `package.json`

Some packages define the top-level `module` field in `package.json`. Although it’s non-standard, bundlers use it. This can lead to differences between usage in the browser and Node.js, but it is not possible to add type definitions for it.

I think it would be useful to report the `module` field if it does not match the `import` condition in the `package.json` `exports` field nor the `main` field.

For example:

- [`monaco-editor`](https://github.com/microsoft/monaco-editor/blob/main/package.json#L34)
- [`vscode-json-languageservice`](https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-json-languageservice/blob/main/package.json#L7)
- [`vscode-uri`](https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-uri/blob/main/package.json#L8)
- [`whatwg-fetch`](https://github.com/JakeChampion/fetch/blob/master/package.json#L6)

首先追踪 package.json 元数据的分析方式，重点关注这里描述的 module 字段、exports import condition 和 main 字段。完成的标准是报告 module 与这些字段不一致的包，列出的示例包可用于检查行为。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。