High Memory Usage and Long GC Times When Writing Parquet Files
- 主要言語
- Java
- スター
- 3.1k
- フォーク
- 1.6k
- 平均マージ
- 3日 12時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 33
説明
### Describe the usage question you have. Please include as many useful details as possible.
In my project, I am using the following code to write Parquet files to the server:
> ParquetWriter parquetWriter = ExampleParquetWriter.builder(new Path(filePath))
.withConf(new Configuration())
.withType(messageType)
.build();
Each Parquet file contains 30000 columns. This code is executed by multiple threads simultaneously, which results in increased GC time. Upon analyzing memory usage, I found that the main memory consumers are related to the following chain:
InternalParquetRecordWriter -> ColumnWriterV1 -> FallbackValuesWriter -> PlainDoubleDictionaryValuesWriter -> IntList
Each thread writes to a file with the same table schema (header), differing only in the filePath.
I initially suspected that the memory usage was caused by the file buffer not being flushed in time. To address this, I tried configuring the writer with the following parameters:
> parquetWriter = ExampleParquetWriter.builder(new Path(filePath))
.withConf(new Configuration())
.withType(messageType)
.withMinRowCountForPageSizeCheck(SpringContextUtils.getApplicationContext()
.getBean(EtlTaskProperties.class).getMinRowCountForPageSizeCheck())
.withMaxRowCountForPageSizeCheck(SpringContextUtils.getApplicationContext()
.getBean(EtlTaskProperties.class).getMaxRowCountForPageSizeCheck())
.withRowGroupSize(SpringContextUtils.getApplicationContext()
.getBean(EtlTaskProperties.class).getRowGroupSize())
.build();
However, these adjustments did not solve the issue. The program still experiences long GC pauses and excessive memory usage.
Expected Behavior
Efficient Parquet file writing with reduced GC time and optimized memory usage when multiple threads are writing files simultaneously.
Observed Behavior
• Increased GC time and excessive memory usage.
• Memory analysis indicates IntList under PlainDoubleDictionaryValuesWriter is the primary consumer of memory.
Request
What are the recommended strategies to mitigate excessive memory usage in this scenario?
Is there a way to share table schema-related objects across threads, or other optimizations to reduce memory overhead?
Please let me know if additional information is needed!
_No response_
コントリビューションガイド
このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません
調査の方向性
エントリポイントの ExampleParquetWriter.builder から開始し、報告されている InternalParquetRecordWriter → ColumnWriterV1 → FallbackValuesWriter → PlainDoubleDictionaryValuesWriter → IntList のチェーンを追跡します。既存の行数および row group の設定を、並行書き込みのシナリオと比較します。Done では、メモリと GC のオーバーヘッドを削減するためのサポートされている方法を特定するか、スキーマ関連のオブジェクトをスレッド間で共有できない理由を明確に文書化する必要があります。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- java
- 領域
- data-engineering
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 25/100