apache / apache/parquet-java

High Memory Usage and Long GC Times When Writing Parquet Files

Abierto
#3,102 3 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub
Lenguaje dominante
Java
Estrellas
3.1k
Forks
1.6k
Merge medio
3 d 12 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
33

Descripción

### Describe the usage question you have. Please include as many useful details as possible.

In my project, I am using the following code to write Parquet files to the server:

> ParquetWriter parquetWriter = ExampleParquetWriter.builder(new Path(filePath))
.withConf(new Configuration())
.withType(messageType)
.build();

Each Parquet file contains 30000 columns. This code is executed by multiple threads simultaneously, which results in increased GC time. Upon analyzing memory usage, I found that the main memory consumers are related to the following chain:

InternalParquetRecordWriter -> ColumnWriterV1 -> FallbackValuesWriter -> PlainDoubleDictionaryValuesWriter -> IntList

Each thread writes to a file with the same table schema (header), differing only in the filePath.

I initially suspected that the memory usage was caused by the file buffer not being flushed in time. To address this, I tried configuring the writer with the following parameters:

> parquetWriter = ExampleParquetWriter.builder(new Path(filePath))
.withConf(new Configuration())
.withType(messageType)
.withMinRowCountForPageSizeCheck(SpringContextUtils.getApplicationContext()
.getBean(EtlTaskProperties.class).getMinRowCountForPageSizeCheck())
.withMaxRowCountForPageSizeCheck(SpringContextUtils.getApplicationContext()
.getBean(EtlTaskProperties.class).getMaxRowCountForPageSizeCheck())
.withRowGroupSize(SpringContextUtils.getApplicationContext()
.getBean(EtlTaskProperties.class).getRowGroupSize())
.build();

However, these adjustments did not solve the issue. The program still experiences long GC pauses and excessive memory usage.

Expected Behavior

Efficient Parquet file writing with reduced GC time and optimized memory usage when multiple threads are writing files simultaneously.

Observed Behavior
• Increased GC time and excessive memory usage.
• Memory analysis indicates IntList under PlainDoubleDictionaryValuesWriter is the primary consumer of memory.

Request

What are the recommended strategies to mitigate excessive memory usage in this scenario?
Is there a way to share table schema-related objects across threads, or other optimizations to reduce memory overhead?

Please let me know if additional information is needed!

_No response_

Guía de contribución

No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio

Línea de trabajo

Comienza en el punto de entrada ExampleParquetWriter.builder y sigue la cadena indicada InternalParquetRecordWriter → ColumnWriterV1 → FallbackValuesWriter → PlainDoubleDictionaryValuesWriter → IntList. Compara la configuración existente del recuento de filas y de los row groups con el escenario de escritura concurrente. Done debe identificar una forma compatible de reducir la sobrecarga de memoria y GC o documentar claramente por qué los objetos relacionados con el esquema no se pueden compartir entre hilos.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Stack tecnológico
java
Área
data-engineering
Tipo de issue
Error
Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Claridad
Necesita aclaración
Aptitud para principiantes
25/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.