apache / apache/cloudstack

VOLUME.CHANGE.DISK.OFFERING does not generate VOLUME.RESIZE usage event when volume size remains unchanged

オープン
#13,734 コメント 1 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る
component:usage-server type:improvement
主要言語
Java
スター
3.1k
フォーク
1.4k
平均マージ
6日 19時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
32

説明

### problem

When a volume's disk offering is changed to another offering with the same size, CloudStack does not emit a VOLUME.RESIZE event in cloud.usage_event

### versions

ACS version is 4.19.1.1

### The steps to reproduce the bug

Steps to reproduce:

Case 1 - Resized volume, same capacity after disk offering change

- Create Volume A using Disk Offering A with an initial size of 300 GB.
- Resize the volume to 400 GB.
- Change the disk offering from Disk Offering A to Disk Offering B, while keeping the volume size at 400 GB.
Result: The disk offering change completed successfully, but no new VOLUME.RESIZE usage event was generated.

Case 2 - Fixed-size disk offerings with the same capacity

- Create Volume A using Disk Offering A with a fixed size of 400 GB.
- Change the disk offering to Disk Offering B, which also has a fixed size of 400 GB.
Result: The disk offering was updated successfully, but no VOLUME.RESIZE usage event was generated.

Case 3 - Custom-size disk offerings with the same capacity

- Create Volume A using Disk Offering A with a custom size of 400 GB.
- Change the disk offering to Disk Offering B, while keeping the volume size at 400 GB.
Result: The disk offering change completed successfully, however no VOLUME.RESIZE usage event was generated.

Case 4 - Disk offering change with a different volume size

- Create Volume A using Disk Offering A with a size of 300 GB.
- Change the volume to Disk Offering B and increase the volume size to 400 GB as part of the same operation.
Result: CloudStack generated both the VOLUME.CHANGE.DISK.OFFERING event and a new VOLUME.RESIZE usage event, and the billing information was updated correctly.

Actual behaviour:

CloudStack generates a `VOLUME.CHANGE.DISK.OFFERING` event in the `cloud.event` table, confirming that the operation completed successfully.

However, no new `VOLUME.RESIZE` entry is created in the `cloud.usage_event` table.

As a result, the usage records continue to reference the previous disk offering, and downstream billing continues to use the old offering information.

Additional observations:

- The volume is successfully updated to Disk Offering B.
- The volume size remains unchanged.
- The latest `cloud.usage_event` entry still references Disk Offering A.
- Billing data derived from `cloud.usage_event` therefore continues to report the previous offering.

### What to do about it?

Expected behaviour:

A usage event should be generated (or the existing usage information updated) so that the billing system reflects the new disk offering, even though the volume size has not changed.

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

調査の方向性

cloud.event と cloud.usage_event におけるディスクオファリングの変更経路と、VOLUME.CHANGE.DISK.OFFERING および VOLUME.RESIZE の処理を追跡します。まず同じサイズのケースを再現し、次にボリュームサイズが変わらない場合でも、オファリングを変更すると新しいオファリングに対して使用量が記録されることを確認します。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
java
領域
backend-api-design, cloud
issue の種類
バグ
難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
活発さ
静か
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
初心者へのやさしさ
50/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。