VOLUME.CHANGE.DISK.OFFERING does not generate VOLUME.RESIZE usage event when volume size remains unchanged
- 主要語言
- Java
- 星號
- 3.1k
- 分支
- 1.4k
- 平均合併
- 6 天 19 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 32
描述
### problem
When a volume's disk offering is changed to another offering with the same size, CloudStack does not emit a VOLUME.RESIZE event in cloud.usage_event
### versions
ACS version is 4.19.1.1
### The steps to reproduce the bug
Steps to reproduce:
Case 1 - Resized volume, same capacity after disk offering change
- Create Volume A using Disk Offering A with an initial size of 300 GB.
- Resize the volume to 400 GB.
- Change the disk offering from Disk Offering A to Disk Offering B, while keeping the volume size at 400 GB.
Result: The disk offering change completed successfully, but no new VOLUME.RESIZE usage event was generated.
Case 2 - Fixed-size disk offerings with the same capacity
- Create Volume A using Disk Offering A with a fixed size of 400 GB.
- Change the disk offering to Disk Offering B, which also has a fixed size of 400 GB.
Result: The disk offering was updated successfully, but no VOLUME.RESIZE usage event was generated.
Case 3 - Custom-size disk offerings with the same capacity
- Create Volume A using Disk Offering A with a custom size of 400 GB.
- Change the disk offering to Disk Offering B, while keeping the volume size at 400 GB.
Result: The disk offering change completed successfully, however no VOLUME.RESIZE usage event was generated.
Case 4 - Disk offering change with a different volume size
- Create Volume A using Disk Offering A with a size of 300 GB.
- Change the volume to Disk Offering B and increase the volume size to 400 GB as part of the same operation.
Result: CloudStack generated both the VOLUME.CHANGE.DISK.OFFERING event and a new VOLUME.RESIZE usage event, and the billing information was updated correctly.
Actual behaviour:
CloudStack generates a `VOLUME.CHANGE.DISK.OFFERING` event in the `cloud.event` table, confirming that the operation completed successfully.
However, no new `VOLUME.RESIZE` entry is created in the `cloud.usage_event` table.
As a result, the usage records continue to reference the previous disk offering, and downstream billing continues to use the old offering information.
Additional observations:
- The volume is successfully updated to Disk Offering B.
- The volume size remains unchanged.
- The latest `cloud.usage_event` entry still references Disk Offering A.
- Billing data derived from `cloud.usage_event` therefore continues to report the previous offering.
### What to do about it?
Expected behaviour:
A usage event should be generated (or the existing usage information updated) so that the billing system reflects the new disk offering, even though the volume size has not changed.
貢獻指南
研究方向
追蹤 cloud.event 和 cloud.usage_event 中的磁碟供給變更路徑,以及對 VOLUME.CHANGE.DISK.OFFERING 和 VOLUME.RESIZE 的處理。先重現大小相同的情況,然後確認即使磁碟區大小未變更,變更供給仍會將使用量記錄到新的供給上。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- java
- 領域
- backend-api-design, cloud
- Issue 類型
- 缺陷
- 難度
- 4/5
- 預估耗時
- 3-5 天
- 活躍度
- 冷清
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 50/100